FTDR
Price
$58.54
Change
+$1.49 (+2.61%)
Updated
Jan 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.55B
40 days until earnings call
RGS
Price
$24.59
Change
+$1.04 (+4.42%)
Updated
Jan 17, 04:51 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
17.1M
Ad is loading...

FTDR vs RGS

Header iconFTDR vs RGS Comparison
Open Charts FTDR vs RGSBanner chart's image
Frontdoor
Price$58.54
Change+$1.49 (+2.61%)
Volume$7.05K
Capitalization2.55B
Regis
Price$24.59
Change+$1.04 (+4.42%)
Volume$100
Capitalization17.1M
FTDR vs RGS Comparison Chart
Loading...
FTDR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FTDR vs. RGS commentary
Jan 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTDR is a Hold and RGS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FTDR: $58.53 vs. RGS: $24.50)
Brand notoriety: FTDR and RGS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FTDR: 94% vs. RGS: 58%
Market capitalization -- FTDR: $2.55B vs. RGS: $17.1M
FTDR [@Other Consumer Services] is valued at $2.55B. RGS’s [@Other Consumer Services] market capitalization is $17.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Services] industry ranges from $121.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Services] industry is $9.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FTDR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRGS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FTDR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FTDR and RGS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FTDR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FTDR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RGS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FTDR is a better buy in the short-term than RGS.

Price Growth

FTDR (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а +5.48% price change this week, while RGS (@Other Consumer Services) price change was +9.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was +1.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

FTDR is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

RGS is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Services (+1.71% weekly)

Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTDR($2.55B) has a higher market cap than RGS($17.1M). FTDR YTD gains are higher at: 4.353 vs. RGS (3.288). FTDR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 306M vs. RGS (22.2M). FTDR has more cash in the bank: 325M vs. RGS (7.15M). RGS has less debt than FTDR: RGS (525M) vs FTDR (610M). FTDR has higher revenues than RGS: FTDR (1.78B) vs RGS (216M).
FTDRRGSFTDR / RGS
Capitalization2.55B17.1M14,936%
EBITDA306M22.2M1,378%
Gain YTD4.3533.288132%
P/E Ratio15.11N/A-
Revenue1.78B216M824%
Total Cash325M7.15M4,544%
Total Debt610M525M116%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FTDR vs RGS: Fundamental Ratings
FTDR
RGS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1569
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
70100
SMR RATING
1..100
127
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3943
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3448
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGS's Valuation (81) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as FTDR (94) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that RGS’s stock grew similarly to FTDR’s over the last 12 months.

FTDR's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as RGS (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that FTDR’s stock grew similarly to RGS’s over the last 12 months.

RGS's SMR Rating (7) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as FTDR (12) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that RGS’s stock grew similarly to FTDR’s over the last 12 months.

FTDR's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as RGS (43) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that FTDR’s stock grew similarly to RGS’s over the last 12 months.

FTDR's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as RGS (48) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that FTDR’s stock grew similarly to RGS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTDRRGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FTDR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KFY70.740.98
+1.40%
Korn Ferry
CSL399.854.45
+1.13%
Carlisle Companies
VERI2.710.01
+0.37%
Veritone
AAMI24.97-0.18
-0.72%
Acadian Asset Management Inc
RDHL5.64-0.06
-0.99%
Redhill Biopharma Ltd

FTDR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTDR has been loosely correlated with TNL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTDR jumps, then TNL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTDR
1D Price
Change %
FTDR100%
+1.39%
TNL - FTDR
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
CSV - FTDR
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
RGS - FTDR
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.17%
SCI - FTDR
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
CCL - FTDR
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
More