Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTDS vs SCHM
FTDS vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts FTDS vs SCHM
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
Price$54.54
Change+$0.25 (+0.46%)
Volume$200
Net Assets24.3M
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$28.76
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
Volume$12.86K
Net Assets11.64B
FTDS vs SCHM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTDS vs. SCHM commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTDS is a Hold and SCHM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 11.6B vs. FTDS (24.3M). FTDS has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHM: FTDS (8.744) vs SCHM (4.798). FTDS was incepted earlier than SCHM: FTDS (19 years) vs SCHM (15 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than FTDS (0.70). FTDS has a higher turnover SCHM (13.00) vs SCHM (13.00).
| FTDS | SCHM | FTDS / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 8.744 | 4.798 | 182% |
| Net Assets | 24.3M | 11.6B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.04 | 1,750% |
| Turnover | 104.00 | 13.00 | 800% |
| Yield | 1.84 | 1.43 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FTDS | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 78% | 8 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FTDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTDS has been closely correlated with SNV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTDS jumps, then SNV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTDS | 100% | +0.37% | ||
| SNV - FTDS | 78% Closely correlated | +1.92% | ||
| CE - FTDS | 76% Closely correlated | -1.54% | ||
| CMA - FTDS | 75% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| PFG - FTDS | 75% Closely correlated | +1.47% | ||
| CBSH - FTDS | 75% Closely correlated | +1.48% | ||
More | ||||
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.91% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | -5.90% | ||
More | ||||