Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTDS vs SCHM
FTDS vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts FTDS vs SCHM
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
Price$51.45
Change+$0.54 (+1.06%)
Volume$4.02K
Net Assets28.01M
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$27.54
Change+$0.29 (+1.06%)
Volume$794.34K
Net Assets11.31B
FTDS vs SCHM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTDS vs. SCHM commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTDS is a Buy and SCHM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 11.3B vs. FTDS (28M). FTDS has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHM: FTDS (2.228) vs SCHM (-0.328). FTDS was incepted earlier than SCHM: FTDS (19 years) vs SCHM (14 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than FTDS (0.70). FTDS has a higher turnover SCHM (13.00) vs SCHM (13.00).
| FTDS | SCHM | FTDS / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 2.228 | -0.328 | -679% |
| Net Assets | 28M | 11.3B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.04 | 1,750% |
| Turnover | 104.00 | 13.00 | 800% |
| Yield | 2.09 | 1.44 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SCHM | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FTDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTDS has been closely correlated with SNV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTDS jumps, then SNV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTDS | 100% | +1.07% | ||
| SNV - FTDS | 78% Closely correlated | +3.07% | ||
| CE - FTDS | 76% Closely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| EWBC - FTDS | 75% Closely correlated | +2.98% | ||
| SSB - FTDS | 75% Closely correlated | +2.74% | ||
| CMA - FTDS | 75% Closely correlated | +2.02% | ||
More | ||||
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +1.06% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.51% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | +6.17% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
More | ||||