Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTDS vs SCHM
FTDS vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts FTDS vs SCHM
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
Price$55.82
Change+$0.54 (+0.98%)
Volume$223
Net Assets27.65M
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$29.68
Change+$0.34 (+1.16%)
Volume$627
Net Assets12.05B
FTDS vs SCHM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTDS vs. SCHM commentary
Sep 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTDS is a Hold and SCHM is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 12B vs. FTDS (27.6M). FTDS has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHM: FTDS (10.264) vs SCHM (6.536). FTDS was incepted earlier than SCHM: FTDS (19 years) vs SCHM (15 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than FTDS (0.70). FTDS has a higher turnover SCHM (13.00) vs SCHM (13.00).
| FTDS | SCHM | FTDS / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 10.264 | 6.536 | 157% |
| Net Assets | 27.6M | 12B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.04 | 1,750% |
| Turnover | 104.00 | 13.00 | 800% |
| Yield | 1.78 | 1.37 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FTDS | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 79% | 8 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FTDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTDS has been closely correlated with SNV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTDS jumps, then SNV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTDS | 100% | -0.55% | ||
| SNV - FTDS | 78% Closely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| CE - FTDS | 76% Closely correlated | -3.10% | ||
| EWBC - FTDS | 75% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| SSB - FTDS | 75% Closely correlated | -1.32% | ||
| CMA - FTDS | 75% Closely correlated | -0.11% | ||
More | ||||
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | -0.14% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | +4.99% | ||
More | ||||