Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTDS vs SCHM
FTDS vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts FTDS vs SCHM
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
Price$53.75
Change+$0.32 (+0.60%)
Volume$1.02K
Net Assets24.18M
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$29.49
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
Volume$934.3K
Net Assets12.07B
FTDS vs SCHM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTDS vs. SCHM commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTDS is a Hold and SCHM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 12.1B vs. FTDS (24.2M). FTDS (7.671) and SCHM (7.570) have matching annual dividend yield . FTDS was incepted earlier than SCHM: FTDS (19 years) vs SCHM (15 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than FTDS (0.70). FTDS has a higher turnover SCHM (13.00) vs SCHM (13.00).
| FTDS | SCHM | FTDS / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 7.671 | 7.570 | 101% |
| Net Assets | 24.2M | 12.1B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.04 | 1,750% |
| Turnover | 104.00 | 13.00 | 800% |
| Yield | 1.79 | 1.43 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FTDS | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 9 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MRCP | 31.14 | 0.13 | +0.41% |
| PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Mar | |||
| GBAB | 15.31 | 0.05 | +0.33% |
| Guggenheim Taxable Municipal | |||
| JLQD | 42.47 | N/A | N/A |
| Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF | |||
| KOMP | 63.07 | -0.57 | -0.90% |
| SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Comps ETF | |||
| SLVO | 94.20 | -1.65 | -1.72% |
| UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered CallETN | |||
FTDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTDS has been closely correlated with SNV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTDS jumps, then SNV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTDS | 100% | +0.60% | ||
| SNV - FTDS | 78% Closely correlated | +2.65% | ||
| CE - FTDS | 76% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| CMA - FTDS | 75% Closely correlated | +1.45% | ||
| PFG - FTDS | 75% Closely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| CBSH - FTDS | 75% Closely correlated | +2.44% | ||
More | ||||
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | -3.10% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
More | ||||