Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTDS vs SCHM
FTDS vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts FTDS vs SCHM
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
Price$55.29
Change+$0.33 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.04M
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$29.56
Change+$0.27 (+0.92%)
Volume$162
Net Assets12.14B
FTDS vs SCHM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTDS vs. SCHM commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTDS is a Hold and SCHM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 12.1B vs. FTDS (25M). FTDS has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHM: FTDS (10.076) vs SCHM (6.841). FTDS was incepted earlier than SCHM: FTDS (19 years) vs SCHM (15 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than FTDS (0.70). FTDS has a higher turnover SCHM (13.00) vs SCHM (13.00).
| FTDS | SCHM | FTDS / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 10.076 | 6.841 | 147% |
| Net Assets | 25M | 12.1B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.04 | 1,750% |
| Turnover | 104.00 | 13.00 | 800% |
| Yield | 1.78 | 1.37 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FTDS | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 79% | 19 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FTDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTDS has been closely correlated with SNV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTDS jumps, then SNV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTDS | 100% | -0.35% | ||
| SNV - FTDS | 78% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| CE - FTDS | 76% Closely correlated | -5.76% | ||
| CMA - FTDS | 75% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| PFG - FTDS | 75% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| CBSH - FTDS | 75% Closely correlated | +0.83% | ||
More | ||||
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | -0.88% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.00% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.26% | ||
More | ||||