Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTDWX vs JSLCX
FTDWX vs JSLCX Comparison
Open Charts FTDWX vs JSLCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% M
Price$14.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.49B
JHancock Multimanager Lifestyle Cnsrv R4
Price$12.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.58B
FTDWX vs JSLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTDWX vs. JSLCX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTDWX is a Buy and JSLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTDWX has more cash in the bank: 5.49B vs. JSLCX (1.58B). JSLCX pays higher dividends than FTDWX: JSLCX (3.85) vs FTDWX (2.70). FTDWX was incepted earlier than JSLCX: FTDWX (19 years) vs JSLCX (20 years). JSLCX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FTDWX (1.02). FTDWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. JSLCX (16.00). FTDWX (0) and JSLCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JSLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.42 vs. FTDWX (6.74). FTDWX return over 5 years is better than : 10.18 vs. JSLCX (8.43).
| FTDWX | JSLCX | FTDWX / JSLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.17 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.245 | 5.502 | 95% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.49B | 1.58B | 347% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.70 | 3.85 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.74 | 7.42 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.23 | 14.78 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.18 | 8.43 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.04 | 24.60 | 94% |