Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTDWX vs JSLCX
FTDWX vs JSLCX Comparison
Open Charts FTDWX vs JSLCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% M
Price$14.09
Change+$0.04 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.56B
JHancock Multimanager Lifestyle Cnsrv R4
Price$12.26
Change+$0.03 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.59B
FTDWX vs JSLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTDWX vs. JSLCX commentary
Sep 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTDWX is a Buy and JSLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTDWX has more cash in the bank: 5.56B vs. JSLCX (1.59B). JSLCX pays higher dividends than FTDWX: JSLCX (3.79) vs FTDWX (2.67). FTDWX was incepted earlier than JSLCX: FTDWX (19 years) vs JSLCX (20 years). JSLCX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FTDWX (1.02). FTDWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. JSLCX (16.00). FTDWX (0) and JSLCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JSLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.06 vs. FTDWX (5.26). FTDWX return over 5 years is better than : 10.61 vs. JSLCX (9.05).
| FTDWX | JSLCX | FTDWX / JSLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.17 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.546 | 6.110 | 91% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.56B | 1.59B | 351% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.67 | 3.79 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.26 | 6.06 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.89 | 18.13 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.61 | 9.05 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.70 | 28.03 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement