Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTDWX vs JULCX
FTDWX vs JULCX Comparison
Open Charts FTDWX vs JULCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% M
Price$14.15
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.56B
JHancock Multimanager Lifestyle Cnsrv R6
Price$12.30
Change+$0.04 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.59B
FTDWX vs JULCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTDWX vs. JULCX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTDWX is a Buy and JULCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTDWX has more cash in the bank: 5.56B vs. JULCX (1.59B). JULCX pays higher dividends than FTDWX: JULCX (4.04) vs FTDWX (2.67). FTDWX was incepted earlier than JULCX: FTDWX (19 years) vs JULCX (14 years). FTDWX (1.02) is less costly to investors than JULCX (0.82). FTDWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. JULCX (16.00). FTDWX has a lower initial minimum investment than JULCX: FTDWX (0) vs JULCX (1000000). JULCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.66 vs. FTDWX (5.98). FTDWX return over 5 years is better than : 11.61 vs. JULCX (10.93).
| FTDWX | JULCX | FTDWX / JULCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.82 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.82 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.508 | 6.939 | 94% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.56B | 1.59B | 350% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.67 | 4.04 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | 6.66 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.64 | 20.31 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.61 | 10.93 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.55 | 31.32 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers