Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTDWX vs MXCPX
FTDWX vs MXCPX Comparison
Open Charts FTDWX vs MXCPX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% M
Price$14.22
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.61B
Empower Conservative Profile I
Price$7.89
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.59B
FTDWX vs MXCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTDWX vs. MXCPX commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTDWX is a Hold and MXCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTDWX has more cash in the bank: 5.61B vs. MXCPX (1.59B). MXCPX pays higher dividends than FTDWX: MXCPX (3.00) vs FTDWX (2.62). FTDWX was incepted earlier than MXCPX: FTDWX (19 years) vs MXCPX (26 years). FTDWX (1.02) is less costly to investors than MXCPX (0.84). MXCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FTDWX (24.00). FTDWX (0) and MXCPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTDWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.03 vs. MXCPX (5.48). FTDWX return over 5 years is better than : 10.55 vs. MXCPX (8.04).
| FTDWX | MXCPX | FTDWX / MXCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.76 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.84 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.576 | 6.362 | 119% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.61B | 1.59B | 352% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.62 | 3.00 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.03 | 5.48 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.74 | 16.12 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.55 | 8.04 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.68 | 20.96 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers