Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTDWX vs MXCPX
FTDWX vs MXCPX Comparison
Open Charts FTDWX vs MXCPX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% M
Price$14.05
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.49B
Empower Conservative Profile I
Price$7.81
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.46B
FTDWX vs MXCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTDWX vs. MXCPX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTDWX is a Buy and MXCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTDWX has more cash in the bank: 5.49B vs. MXCPX (1.46B). MXCPX pays higher dividends than FTDWX: MXCPX (3.01) vs FTDWX (2.70). FTDWX was incepted earlier than MXCPX: FTDWX (19 years) vs MXCPX (26 years). FTDWX (1.02) is less costly to investors than MXCPX (0.85). MXCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FTDWX (24.00). FTDWX (0) and MXCPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTDWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.87 vs. MXCPX (4.25). FTDWX return over 5 years is better than : 10.97 vs. MXCPX (9.73).
| FTDWX | MXCPX | FTDWX / MXCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.77 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.85 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.621 | 5.256 | 107% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.49B | 1.46B | 376% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.70 | 3.01 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.87 | 4.25 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.64 | 7.85 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.97 | 9.73 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.76 | 17.49 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement