Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTDWX vs MXIPX
FTDWX vs MXIPX Comparison
Open Charts FTDWX vs MXIPX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% M
Price$14.26
Change-$0.03 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.57B
Empower Conservative Profile L
Price$9.79
Change-$0.03 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.56B
FTDWX vs MXIPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTDWX vs. MXIPX commentary
Oct 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTDWX is a Buy and MXIPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTDWX has more cash in the bank: 5.57B vs. MXIPX (1.56B). FTDWX pays higher dividends than MXIPX: FTDWX (2.64) vs MXIPX (2.01). FTDWX was incepted earlier than MXIPX: FTDWX (19 years) vs MXIPX (14 years). MXIPX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FTDWX (1.02). MXIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FTDWX (24.00). FTDWX (0) and MXIPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTDWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.88 vs. MXIPX (5.58). FTDWX return over 5 years is better than : 12.46 vs. MXIPX (11.39).
| FTDWX | MXIPX | FTDWX / MXIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.02 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.10 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.863 | 6.876 | 114% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.57B | 1.56B | 358% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 2.01 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.88 | 5.58 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.05 | 22.10 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.46 | 11.39 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.35 | 23.57 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement