Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTDWX vs MXIPX
FTDWX vs MXIPX Comparison
Open Charts FTDWX vs MXIPX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% M
Price$14.05
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.49B
Empower Conservative Profile L
Price$9.66
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.46B
FTDWX vs MXIPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTDWX vs. MXIPX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTDWX is a Buy and MXIPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTDWX has more cash in the bank: 5.49B vs. MXIPX (1.46B). FTDWX pays higher dividends than MXIPX: FTDWX (2.70) vs MXIPX (2.02). FTDWX was incepted earlier than MXIPX: FTDWX (19 years) vs MXIPX (14 years). MXIPX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FTDWX (1.02). MXIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FTDWX (24.00). FTDWX (0) and MXIPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTDWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.87 vs. MXIPX (4.17). FTDWX return over 5 years is better than : 10.97 vs. MXIPX (10.28).
| FTDWX | MXIPX | FTDWX / MXIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.02 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.10 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.621 | 5.114 | 110% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.49B | 1.46B | 376% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.70 | 2.02 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.87 | 4.17 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.64 | 8.38 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.97 | 10.28 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.76 | 18.93 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement