FTFI
Price
$30.00
Change
-$0.25 (-0.83%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
47.97M
MFDB
Price
$2.55
Change
+$0.16 (+6.69%)
Updated
Jul 30 closing price
Capitalization
5.17M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTFI vs MFDB

Header iconFTFI vs MFDB Comparison
Open Charts FTFI vs MFDBBanner chart's image
First Berlin Ban
Price$30.00
Change-$0.25 (-0.83%)
Volume$1.08K
Capitalization47.97M
Mutual Federal Ban
Price$2.55
Change+$0.16 (+6.69%)
Volume$7.5K
Capitalization5.17M
FTFI vs MFDB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FTFI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFDB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FTFI vs. MFDB commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTFI is a Hold and MFDB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FTFI: $30.00 vs. MFDB: $2.55)
Brand notoriety: FTFI and MFDB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FTFI: 61% vs. MFDB: 548%
Market capitalization -- FTFI: $47.97M vs. MFDB: $5.17M
FTFI [@Regional Banks] is valued at $47.97M. MFDB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FTFI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMFDB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FTFI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MFDB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FTFI is a better buy in the long-term than MFDB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FTFI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFDB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FTFI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MFDB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FTFI and MFDB are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FTFI (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.69% price change this week, while MFDB (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.20% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFI($48M) has a higher market cap than MFDB($5.17M). FTFI YTD gains are higher at: 27.660 vs. MFDB (-15.000).
FTFIMFDBFTFI / MFDB
Capitalization48M5.17M929%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD27.660-15.000-184%
P/E Ratio6.29N/A-
Revenue26.3MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt51.3MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFDB: Fundamental Ratings
MFDB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
41
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTFIMFDB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTFI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFDB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFMTF0.140.01
+5.03%
Defense Metals Corp.
TSCDY16.880.09
+0.54%
Tesco PLC
TAPM0.40N/A
N/A
Tapinator, Inc.
EDESY19.15N/A
N/A
Elders Ltd
ELSSF29.00N/A
N/A
ELIS

FTFI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FTFI and PGNN have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTFI and PGNN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTFI
1D Price
Change %
FTFI100%
N/A
PGNN - FTFI
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.17%
OTPBF - FTFI
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MFDB - FTFI
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HMST - FTFI
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
AFNL - FTFI
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MFDB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFDB has been loosely correlated with AMFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MFDB jumps, then AMFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFDB
1D Price
Change %
MFDB100%
N/A
AMFC - MFDB
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
FBSI - MFDB
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HMST - MFDB
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
SVBT - MFDB
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
FTFI - MFDB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More