FTFI
Price
$29.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 28 closing price
Capitalization
47.97M
MFDB
Price
$2.25
Change
+$0.10 (+4.65%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
5.17M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTFI vs MFDB

Header iconFTFI vs MFDB Comparison
Open Charts FTFI vs MFDBBanner chart's image
First Berlin Ban
Price$29.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.27K
Capitalization47.97M
Mutual Federal Ban
Price$2.25
Change+$0.10 (+4.65%)
Volume$400
Capitalization5.17M
FTFI vs MFDB Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FTFI vs. MFDB commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTFI is a Hold and MFDB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FTFI: $29.00 vs. MFDB: $2.25)
Brand notoriety: FTFI and MFDB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FTFI: 232% vs. MFDB: 15%
Market capitalization -- FTFI: $47.97M vs. MFDB: $5.17M
FTFI [@Regional Banks] is valued at $47.97M. MFDB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FTFI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMFDB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FTFI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MFDB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FTFI is a better buy in the long-term than MFDB.

Price Growth

FTFI (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MFDB (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.23% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFI($48M) has a higher market cap than MFDB($5.17M). FTFI YTD gains are higher at: 23.404 vs. MFDB (-25.000).
FTFIMFDBFTFI / MFDB
Capitalization48M5.17M929%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.404-25.000-94%
P/E Ratio6.29N/A-
Revenue26.3MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt51.3MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFDB: Fundamental Ratings
MFDB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
79
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OAKWX24.690.07
+0.28%
Oakmark Global Select Investor
SASVX6.06N/A
N/A
Virtus Ceredex Small-Cap Value Eq A
MLVHX19.15N/A
N/A
MFS Low Volatility Equity I
JHTGX19.26N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Hedged Equity 3 R5
TRJZX108.70N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Z

FTFI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FTFI and PGNN have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTFI and PGNN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTFI
1D Price
Change %
FTFI100%
N/A
PGNN - FTFI
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
OTPBF - FTFI
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOID - FTFI
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MFDB - FTFI
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HMST - FTFI
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
More

MFDB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFDB has been loosely correlated with AMFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MFDB jumps, then AMFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFDB
1D Price
Change %
MFDB100%
N/A
AMFC - MFDB
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FBSI - MFDB
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HMST - MFDB
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
SVBT - MFDB
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
BOID - MFDB
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More