Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTFQX vs MCAMX
FTFQX vs MCAMX Comparison
Open Charts FTFQX vs MCAMX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.62
Change+$0.05 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.7B
NYLI MacKay California Muni Class C2
Price$9.35
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.29B
FTFQX vs MCAMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTFQX vs. MCAMX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTFQX is a Hold and MCAMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 12.7B vs. MCAMX (1.29B). FTFQX pays higher dividends than MCAMX: FTFQX (3.63) vs MCAMX (3.12). FTFQX was incepted earlier than MCAMX: FTFQX (7 years) vs MCAMX (5 years). MCAMX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FTFQX (0.76). MCAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FTFQX (7.96). FTFQX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCAMX: FTFQX (1000) vs MCAMX (2500). FTFQX (-1.31) and MCAMX (-1.31) have marching annual gain over last year. MCAMX return over 5 years is better than : -1.33 vs. FTFQX (-3.60).
| FTFQX | MCAMX | FTFQX / MCAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.18 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.19 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.685 | -1.317 | 52% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.7B | 1.29B | 987% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.63 | 3.12 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.31 | -1.31 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.82 | 8.53 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.60 | -1.33 | 271% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement