Ad is loading...
FTFQX vs MSCCX
FTFQX vs MSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTFQX vs MSCCX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.63
Change+$0.03 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.47B
NYLI MacKay California Muni
Price$9.39
Change+$0.03 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
FTFQX vs MSCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTFQX vs. MSCCX commentary
May 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTFQX is a Hold and MSCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. MSCCX (1.24B). FTFQX pays higher dividends than MSCCX: FTFQX (3.50) vs MSCCX (3.28). FTFQX was incepted earlier than MSCCX: FTFQX (7 years) vs MSCCX (12 years). MSCCX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FTFQX (0.76). MSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FTFQX (14.01). FTFQX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSCCX: FTFQX (1000) vs MSCCX (2500). FTFQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.76 vs. MSCCX (0.32). MSCCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.30 vs. FTFQX (-1.18).
| FTFQX | MSCCX | FTFQX / MSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.03 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.04 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.529 | -2.543 | 99% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5B | 1.24B | 1,005% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.50 | 3.28 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.76 | 0.32 | 237% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.06 | 6.23 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.18 | 3.30 | -36% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 19.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...