Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTFQX vs MSCCX
FTFQX vs MSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTFQX vs MSCCX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.57
Change-$0.01 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.53B
NYLI MacKay California Muni
Price$9.33
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
FTFQX vs MSCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTFQX vs. MSCCX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTFQX is a Hold and MSCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. MSCCX (1.24B). FTFQX pays higher dividends than MSCCX: FTFQX (3.59) vs MSCCX (3.32). FTFQX was incepted earlier than MSCCX: FTFQX (7 years) vs MSCCX (12 years). MSCCX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FTFQX (0.76). MSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FTFQX (7.96). FTFQX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSCCX: FTFQX (1000) vs MSCCX (2500). FTFQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.13 vs. MSCCX (-1.39). MSCCX return over 5 years is better than : -1.04 vs. FTFQX (-4.22).
| FTFQX | MSCCX | FTFQX / MSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.03 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.04 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.209 | -2.643 | 84% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5B | 1.24B | 1,007% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.59 | 3.32 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.13 | -1.39 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.85 | 9.02 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.22 | -1.04 | 405% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 19.37 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers