Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTFQX vs MSCCX
FTFQX vs MSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTFQX vs MSCCX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.41B
NYLI MacKay California Muni
Price$9.26
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.23B
FTFQX vs MSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTFQX vs. MSCCX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTFQX is a Hold and MSCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. MSCCX (1.23B). FTFQX pays higher dividends than MSCCX: FTFQX (3.60) vs MSCCX (3.31). FTFQX was incepted earlier than MSCCX: FTFQX (7 years) vs MSCCX (12 years). MSCCX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FTFQX (0.76). MSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FTFQX (7.96). FTFQX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSCCX: FTFQX (1000) vs MSCCX (2500). MSCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.12 vs. FTFQX (-2.30). MSCCX return over 5 years is better than : -3.15 vs. FTFQX (-6.57).
| FTFQX | MSCCX | FTFQX / MSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.03 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.04 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.114 | -3.111 | 100% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 1.23B | 1,008% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.60 | 3.31 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.30 | -2.12 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.84 | 3.08 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.57 | -3.15 | 209% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 18.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement