Ad is loading...
FTFQX vs MSCVX
FTFQX vs MSCVX Comparison
Open Charts FTFQX vs MSCVX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.59
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.44B
NYLI MacKay California Muni Investor Cl
Price$9.35
Change+$0.03 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
FTFQX vs MSCVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTFQX vs. MSCVX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTFQX is a Hold and MSCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. MSCVX (1.24B). MSCVX (3.54) and FTFQX (3.50) have matching dividends . FTFQX was incepted earlier than MSCVX: FTFQX (7 years) vs MSCVX (12 years). MSCVX (0.79) and FTFQX (0.76) have similar cost to investors . MSCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FTFQX (14.01). FTFQX initial investment is less costly to investors than MSCVX (3%) vs MSCVX (3%). FTFQX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSCVX: FTFQX (1000) vs MSCVX (2500). FTFQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.05 vs. MSCVX (0.53). MSCVX return over 5 years is better than : 3.56 vs. FTFQX (-1.46).
| FTFQX | MSCVX | FTFQX / MSCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.78 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.79 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.676 | -2.898 | 92% |
| Front Load | 4% | 3% | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 1.24B | 998% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.50 | 3.54 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.05 | 0.53 | 199% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.46 | 6.58 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.46 | 3.56 | -41% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 21.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers