Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTFQX vs OPCAX
FTFQX vs OPCAX Comparison
Open Charts FTFQX vs OPCAX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.74
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.9B
Invesco California Municipal A
Price$7.86
Change+$0.02 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
FTFQX vs OPCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTFQX vs. OPCAX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTFQX is a Hold and OPCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 12.9B vs. OPCAX (2.07B). FTFQX (3.63) and OPCAX (3.48) have matching dividends . FTFQX was incepted earlier than OPCAX: FTFQX (7 years) vs OPCAX (37 years). OPCAX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FTFQX (0.76). OPCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. FTFQX (7.96). OPCAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FTFQX (4%) vs FTFQX (4%). FTFQX (1000) and OPCAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTFQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.10 vs. OPCAX (-1.52). OPCAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.01 vs. FTFQX (-1.88).
| FTFQX | OPCAX | FTFQX / OPCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.11 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.11 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.965 | -0.724 | -133% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 88% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.9B | 2.07B | 622% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.63 | 3.48 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.10 | -1.52 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.59 | 11.55 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.88 | 3.01 | -62% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 24.39 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement