Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTFQX vs OPCAX
FTFQX vs OPCAX Comparison
Open Charts FTFQX vs OPCAX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.81
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.04B
Invesco California Municipal A
Price$7.94
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.13B
FTFQX vs OPCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTFQX vs. OPCAX commentary
Oct 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTFQX is a Hold and OPCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 13B vs. OPCAX (2.13B). OPCAX pays higher dividends than FTFQX: OPCAX (4.07) vs FTFQX (3.57). FTFQX was incepted earlier than OPCAX: FTFQX (7 years) vs OPCAX (37 years). OPCAX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FTFQX (0.76). OPCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. FTFQX (7.96). OPCAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FTFQX (4%) vs FTFQX (4%). FTFQX (1000) and OPCAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTFQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.04 vs. OPCAX (1.99). OPCAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.38 vs. FTFQX (0.62).
| FTFQX | OPCAX | FTFQX / OPCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.11 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.11 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.459 | 1.267 | 194% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 88% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13B | 2.13B | 610% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.57 | 4.07 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.04 | 1.99 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.32 | 20.51 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.62 | 5.38 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 25.66 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement