Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTFQX vs PRXCX
FTFQX vs PRXCX Comparison
Open Charts FTFQX vs PRXCX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.52
Change-$0.02 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.48B
T. Rowe Price California Tax-Free Bond
Price$10.31
Change-$0.03 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets733.62M
FTFQX vs PRXCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTFQX vs. PRXCX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTFQX is a Hold and PRXCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. PRXCX (734M). FTFQX (3.60) and PRXCX (3.43) have matching dividends . FTFQX was incepted earlier than PRXCX: FTFQX (7 years) vs PRXCX (39 years). FTFQX (0.76) is less costly to investors than PRXCX (0.58). PRXCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.30 vs. FTFQX (7.96). FTFQX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRXCX: FTFQX (1000) vs PRXCX (2500). PRXCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.74 vs. FTFQX (-1.99). PRXCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.93 vs. FTFQX (-5.75).
| FTFQX | PRXCX | FTFQX / PRXCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.58 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.58 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.517 | -2.907 | 87% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5B | 734M | 1,703% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.60 | 3.43 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.99 | -1.74 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.63 | 6.06 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.75 | 0.93 | -619% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 13.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement