Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTFQX vs TACAX
FTFQX vs TACAX Comparison
Open Charts FTFQX vs TACAX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.57
Change-$0.01 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.51B
JHancock CA Municipal Bond A
Price$9.51
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets517.78M
FTFQX vs TACAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTFQX vs. TACAX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTFQX is a Hold and TACAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. TACAX (518M). TACAX (3.65) and FTFQX (3.59) have matching dividends . FTFQX was incepted earlier than TACAX: FTFQX (7 years) vs TACAX (35 years). TACAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FTFQX (0.76). TACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FTFQX (7.96). TACAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FTFQX (4%) vs FTFQX (4%). FTFQX (1000) and TACAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTFQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.28 vs. TACAX (-2.21). TACAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.31 vs. FTFQX (-4.36).
| FTFQX | TACAX | FTFQX / TACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.74 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.91 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.358 | -3.729 | 63% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 94% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5B | 518M | 2,413% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.59 | 3.65 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.28 | -2.21 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.69 | 8.30 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.36 | 3.31 | -132% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 21.16 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement