Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTFQX vs TACAX
FTFQX vs TACAX Comparison
Open Charts FTFQX vs TACAX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.74
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.9B
JHancock CA Municipal Bond A
Price$9.80
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets524.18M
FTFQX vs TACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTFQX vs. TACAX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTFQX is a Hold and TACAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 12.9B vs. TACAX (524M). TACAX (3.77) and FTFQX (3.63) have matching dividends . FTFQX was incepted earlier than TACAX: FTFQX (7 years) vs TACAX (36 years). TACAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FTFQX (0.76). TACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FTFQX (7.96). TACAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FTFQX (4%) vs FTFQX (4%). FTFQX (1000) and TACAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTFQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.10 vs. TACAX (-1.05). TACAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.54 vs. FTFQX (-1.88).
| FTFQX | TACAX | FTFQX / TACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.74 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.91 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.965 | -0.010 | -9,898% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 94% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.9B | 524M | 2,462% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.63 | 3.77 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.10 | -1.05 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.59 | 12.53 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.88 | 5.54 | -34% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 24.55 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement