Ad is loading...
FTFQX vs TACAX
FTFQX vs TACAX Comparison
Open Charts FTFQX vs TACAX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.58
Change+$0.03 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.37B
JHancock CA Municipal Bond A
Price$9.53
Change+$0.06 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets509.56M
FTFQX vs TACAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTFQX vs. TACAX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTFQX is a Hold and TACAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. TACAX (510M). FTFQX (3.50) and TACAX (3.50) have matching dividends . FTFQX was incepted earlier than TACAX: FTFQX (7 years) vs TACAX (35 years). TACAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FTFQX (0.76). TACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FTFQX (14.01). TACAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FTFQX (4%) vs FTFQX (4%). FTFQX (1000) and TACAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTFQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.14 vs. TACAX (-1.01). TACAX return over 5 years is better than : 6.10 vs. FTFQX (-2.06).
| FTFQX | TACAX | FTFQX / TACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.74 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.91 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.267 | -4.743 | 69% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 94% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 510M | 2,431% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.50 | 3.50 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.14 | -1.01 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.99 | 4.23 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.06 | 6.10 | -34% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 18.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...