Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTGFX vs TEDSX
FTGFX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts FTGFX vs TEDSX
Templeton Growth R6
Price$31.27
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.06B
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$31.68
Change-$0.15 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.13B
FTGFX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTGFX vs. TEDSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTGFX is a Hold and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX (9.13B) and FTGFX (9.06B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FTGFX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: FTGFX (0.97) vs TEDSX (0.75). FTGFX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: FTGFX (13 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FTGFX (0.74). FTGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.43 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTGFX: TEDSX (1000) vs FTGFX (1000000). FTGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.87 vs. TEDSX (1.97). FTGFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.59 vs. TEDSX (22.13).
| FTGFX | TEDSX | FTGFX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.96 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.96 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.648 | 13.395 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.06B | 9.13B | 99% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.75 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.87 | 1.97 | 702% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.94 | 14.16 | 331% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.59 | 22.13 | 201% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.72 | 4.90 | 912% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers