Ad is loading...
FTGFX vs TEDSX
FTGFX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts FTGFX vs TEDSX
Templeton Growth R6
Price$25.24
Change-$0.04 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.68B
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$28.54
Change+$0.19 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.43B
FTGFX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTGFX vs. TEDSX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTGFX is a Hold and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 8.44B vs. FTGFX (7.68B). FTGFX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: FTGFX (1.17) vs TEDSX (0.92). FTGFX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: FTGFX (12 years) vs TEDSX (32 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FTGFX (0.74). FTGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.43 vs. TEDSX (35.47). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTGFX: TEDSX (1000) vs FTGFX (1000000). FTGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.33 vs. TEDSX (-4.93). FTGFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.66 vs. TEDSX (28.13).
| FTGFX | TEDSX | FTGFX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.96 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.96 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.988 | 0.998 | -400% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.68B | 8.44B | 91% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.92 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.33 | -4.93 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.53 | -5.54 | -208% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.66 | 28.13 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.55 | -14.25 | -60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers