Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTGFX vs TEDSX
FTGFX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts FTGFX vs TEDSX
Templeton Growth R6
Price$29.06
Change+$0.23 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.67B
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$31.31
Change+$0.24 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.13B
FTGFX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTGFX vs. TEDSX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTGFX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.13B vs. FTGFX (8.67B). FTGFX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: FTGFX (1.10) vs TEDSX (0.91). FTGFX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: FTGFX (12 years) vs TEDSX (32 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FTGFX (0.74). FTGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.43 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTGFX: TEDSX (1000) vs FTGFX (1000000). FTGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.16 vs. TEDSX (0.71). FTGFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.91 vs. TEDSX (24.33).
| FTGFX | TEDSX | FTGFX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.96 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.96 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.495 | 10.688 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.67B | 9.13B | 95% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.91 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.16 | 0.71 | 728% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.63 | 2.02 | 1,417% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.91 | 24.33 | 197% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.97 | -4.66 | -557% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement