Ad is loading...
FTGFX vs TEDSX
FTGFX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts FTGFX vs TEDSX
Templeton Growth R6
Price$27.25
Change+$0.11 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.21B
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$29.98
Change+$0.05 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.86B
FTGFX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTGFX vs. TEDSX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTGFX is a Buy and TEDSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 8.86B vs. FTGFX (8.21B). FTGFX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: FTGFX (1.17) vs TEDSX (0.94). FTGFX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: FTGFX (12 years) vs TEDSX (32 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FTGFX (0.74). FTGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.43 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTGFX: TEDSX (1000) vs FTGFX (1000000). FTGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.44 vs. TEDSX (-2.86). FTGFX return over 5 years is better than : 51.52 vs. TEDSX (34.38).
| FTGFX | TEDSX | FTGFX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.96 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.96 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.076 | 6.626 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.21B | 8.86B | 93% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.94 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.44 | -2.86 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.32 | 5.01 | 585% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.52 | 34.38 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.97 | -9.52 | -157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers