Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTGFX vs TEDSX
FTGFX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts FTGFX vs TEDSX
Templeton Growth R6
Price$30.27
Change-$0.04 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.01B
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$31.45
Change-$0.18 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.16B
FTGFX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTGFX vs. TEDSX commentary
Jul 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTGFX is a Hold and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX (9.16B) and FTGFX (9.01B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FTGFX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: FTGFX (1.04) vs TEDSX (0.88). FTGFX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: FTGFX (12 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FTGFX (0.74). FTGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.43 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTGFX: TEDSX (1000) vs FTGFX (1000000). FTGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.17 vs. TEDSX (0.14). FTGFX return over 5 years is better than : 55.38 vs. TEDSX (31.27).
| FTGFX | TEDSX | FTGFX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.96 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.96 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.964 | 12.041 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.01B | 9.16B | 98% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.88 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.17 | 0.14 | 7,235% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.86 | 12.16 | 377% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.38 | 31.27 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.88 | -3.72 | -857% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement