Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTGQX vs TEDSX
FTGQX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts FTGQX vs TEDSX
Templeton Growth C
Price$27.72
Change-$0.05 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.68B
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$31.07
Change+$0.05 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.12B
FTGQX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTGQX vs. TEDSX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTGQX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX (9.12B) and FTGQX (8.68B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . TEDSX pays higher dividends than FTGQX: TEDSX (0.91) vs FTGQX (0.80). FTGQX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: FTGQX (7 years) vs TEDSX (32 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FTGQX (1.77). FTGQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.43 vs. TEDSX (34.55). FTGQX (1000) and TEDSX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTGQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.21 vs. TEDSX (0.55). FTGQX return over 5 years is better than : 42.62 vs. TEDSX (24.13).
| FTGQX | TEDSX | FTGQX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.96 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.96 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.245 | 10.509 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.68B | 9.12B | 95% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.21 | 0.55 | 770% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.06 | 2.42 | 1,077% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.62 | 24.13 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -4.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers