Ad is loading...
FTGQX vs TEDSX
FTGQX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts FTGQX vs TEDSX
Templeton Growth C
Price$24.63
Change+$1.72 (+7.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.24B
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$28.44
Change+$1.59 (+5.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.01B
FTGQX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTGQX vs. TEDSX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTGQX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 8.01B vs. FTGQX (7.25B). TEDSX pays higher dividends than FTGQX: TEDSX (0.92) vs FTGQX (0.85). FTGQX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: FTGQX (7 years) vs TEDSX (32 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FTGQX (1.77). FTGQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.43 vs. TEDSX (35.47). FTGQX (1000) and TEDSX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTGQX (-12.96) and TEDSX (-13.50) have marching annual gain over last year. FTGQX return over 5 years is better than : 31.14 vs. TEDSX (20.13).
| FTGQX | TEDSX | FTGQX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.96 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.96 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.874 | -4.346 | 227% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.25B | 8.01B | 90% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.92 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.96 | -13.50 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.63 | -10.86 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.14 | 20.13 | 155% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -19.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers