Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTGQX vs TEDSX
FTGQX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts FTGQX vs TEDSX
Templeton Growth C
Price$29.91
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.06B
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$31.68
Change-$0.15 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.13B
FTGQX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTGQX vs. TEDSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTGQX is a Hold and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX (9.13B) and FTGQX (9.06B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . TEDSX pays higher dividends than FTGQX: TEDSX (0.75) vs FTGQX (0.71). FTGQX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: FTGQX (7 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FTGQX (1.77). FTGQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.43 vs. TEDSX (34.55). FTGQX (1000) and TEDSX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTGQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.67 vs. TEDSX (1.97). FTGQX return over 5 years is better than : 39.14 vs. TEDSX (22.13).
| FTGQX | TEDSX | FTGQX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.96 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.96 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.585 | 13.395 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.06B | 9.13B | 99% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.75 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.67 | 1.97 | 641% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.76 | 14.16 | 302% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.14 | 22.13 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 4.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers