FTGS vs LRCX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTGS is a Buy and LRCX is a Hold.
LRCX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 51 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FTGS | LRCX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | 12 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 86% | 12 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 86% | 12 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 65% | 12 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 83% | 14 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 64% | 12 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 61% | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BSPPX | 700.85 | 6.94 | +1.00% |
| iShares S&P 500 Index Investor P | |||
| FRNRX | 30.78 | 0.24 | +0.79% |
| Franklin Natural Resources A | |||
| MPRSX | 9.75 | 0.04 | +0.41% |
| MassMutual Strat Emerg Mkts R4 | |||
| MDRFX | 21.16 | 0.08 | +0.38% |
| BlackRock Mid-Cap Value Investor A | |||
| DIEMX | 37.07 | 0.13 | +0.35% |
| Driehaus Emerging Markets Growth Instl | |||
FTGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTGS has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTGS jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTGS | 100% | +0.53% | ||
| KLAC - FTGS | 77% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| LRCX - FTGS | 77% Closely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| AMAT - FTGS | 75% Closely correlated | +2.99% | ||
| MPWR - FTGS | 74% Closely correlated | +4.89% | ||
| SNPS - FTGS | 72% Closely correlated | +2.11% | ||
More | ||||
LRCX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRCX has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRCX jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | 100% | +1.36% | ||
| AMAT - LRCX | 94% Closely correlated | +2.99% | ||
| KLAC - LRCX | 91% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| ASML - LRCX | 82% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| VECO - LRCX | 82% Closely correlated | +1.63% | ||
| ONTO - LRCX | 81% Closely correlated | +1.68% | ||
More | ||||