Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs FZAOX
FTHFX vs FZAOX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs FZAOX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.16
Change+$0.61 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.26B
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Z
Price$35.60
Change+$0.63 (+1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
FTHFX vs FZAOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. FZAOX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and FZAOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. FZAOX (2.01B). FZAOX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: FZAOX (1.55) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than FZAOX: FTHFX (14 years) vs FZAOX (12 years). FZAOX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX (41.00) and FZAOX (40.00) have comparable annual turnover. FZAOX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: FZAOX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.53 vs. FZAOX (0.06). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 103.71 vs. FZAOX (40.24).
| FTHFX | FZAOX | FTHFX / FZAOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.90 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.90 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.502 | 8.769 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 2.01B | 561% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.55 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.53 | 0.06 | 13,310% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.33 | 27.23 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.71 | 40.24 | 258% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.64 | 25.94 | 689% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement