Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs GCSUX
FTHFX vs GCSUX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GCSUX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.55
Change-$2.65 (-6.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.94B
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts R6
Price$23.83
Change-$1.64 (-6.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets394.44M
FTHFX vs GCSUX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GCSUX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and GCSUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.94B vs. GCSUX (394M). GCSUX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: GCSUX (1.17) vs FTHFX (0.82). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GCSUX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GCSUX (10 years). GCSUX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GCSUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 164.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCSUX: FTHFX (1000000) vs GCSUX (5000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.12 vs. GCSUX (-7.84). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 137.69 vs. GCSUX (53.54).
| FTHFX | GCSUX | FTHFX / GCSUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.83 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.92 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.888 | -8.315 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 5000000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.94B | 394M | 2,522% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.17 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.12 | -7.84 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.25 | 0.78 | 3,356% |
| Returns for 5 years | 137.69 | 53.54 | 257% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...