Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GCSUX
FTHFX vs GCSUX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GCSUX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.72
Change-$0.48 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.62B
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts R6
Price$28.05
Change-$0.44 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets449.38M
FTHFX vs GCSUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GCSUX commentary
Jul 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GCSUX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. GCSUX (449M). GCSUX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: GCSUX (1.08) vs FTHFX (0.76). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GCSUX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GCSUX (10 years). GCSUX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GCSUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 164.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCSUX: FTHFX (1000000) vs GCSUX (5000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.03 vs. GCSUX (-2.59). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 103.31 vs. GCSUX (25.91).
| FTHFX | GCSUX | FTHFX / GCSUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.83 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.92 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.862 | 0.972 | 294% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 5000000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 449M | 2,361% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.08 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.03 | -2.59 | -117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.68 | 33.12 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.31 | 25.91 | 399% |
| Returns for 10 years | 145.26 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers