Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GSQRX
FTHFX vs GSQRX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GSQRX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.73
Change-$0.69 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.11B
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value R
Price$30.77
Change-$0.56 (-1.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets903.02M
FTHFX vs GSQRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GSQRX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and GSQRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.1B vs. GSQRX (903M). GSQRX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: GSQRX (1.01) vs FTHFX (0.79). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GSQRX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GSQRX (18 years). GSQRX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GSQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). GSQRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GSQRX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.23 vs. GSQRX (-13.73). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 96.61 vs. GSQRX (-11.32).
| FTHFX | GSQRX | FTHFX / GSQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.50 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.68 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.202 | -2.551 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.1B | 903M | 1,118% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.01 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.23 | -13.73 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.67 | -24.02 | -173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.61 | -11.32 | -853% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.97 | -39.93 | -340% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers