Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GSQRX
FTHFX vs GSQRX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GSQRX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.57
Change-$0.39 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.28B
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value R
Price$34.31
Change-$0.22 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets939.43M
FTHFX vs GSQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GSQRX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and GSQRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. GSQRX (939M). GSQRX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: GSQRX (0.91) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GSQRX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GSQRX (18 years). GSQRX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GSQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). GSQRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GSQRX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.10 vs. GSQRX (-11.85). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 113.38 vs. GSQRX (-4.23).
| FTHFX | GSQRX | FTHFX / GSQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.50 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.68 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.996 | 7.403 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 939M | 1,203% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.10 | -11.85 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.07 | -9.82 | -652% |
| Returns for 5 years | 113.38 | -4.23 | -2,681% |
| Returns for 10 years | 188.90 | -24.21 | -780% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement