Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GSQRX
FTHFX vs GSQRX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GSQRX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.67
Change+$0.81 (+1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.6B
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value R
Price$32.67
Change+$0.20 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets908.11M
FTHFX vs GSQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GSQRX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GSQRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. GSQRX (908M). GSQRX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: GSQRX (0.98) vs FTHFX (0.76). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GSQRX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GSQRX (18 years). GSQRX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GSQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). GSQRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GSQRX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.29 vs. GSQRX (-17.90). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 96.34 vs. GSQRX (-11.27).
| FTHFX | GSQRX | FTHFX / GSQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.50 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.68 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.170 | 0.995 | 319% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 908M | 1,167% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.98 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.29 | -17.90 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.05 | -22.74 | -189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.34 | -11.27 | -855% |
| Returns for 10 years | 148.43 | -34.49 | -430% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement