Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GSQRX
FTHFX vs GSQRX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GSQRX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.91
Change+$0.37 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.66B
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value R
Price$32.84
Change+$0.20 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets927.9M
FTHFX vs GSQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GSQRX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GSQRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. GSQRX (928M). GSQRX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: GSQRX (0.98) vs FTHFX (0.76). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GSQRX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GSQRX (18 years). GSQRX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GSQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). GSQRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GSQRX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.98 vs. GSQRX (-9.60). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 102.86 vs. GSQRX (-7.07).
| FTHFX | GSQRX | FTHFX / GSQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.50 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.68 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.280 | 2.146 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 928M | 1,153% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.98 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | -9.60 | -62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.75 | -19.18 | -259% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.86 | -7.07 | -1,455% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.69 | -35.79 | -424% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement