Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs HFCGX
FTHFX vs HFCGX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs HFCGX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.55
Change-$2.65 (-6.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.94B
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Investor
Price$29.07
Change-$2.03 (-6.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets497.61M
FTHFX vs HFCGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. HFCGX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and HFCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.94B vs. HFCGX (498M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than HFCGX: FTHFX (0.82) vs HFCGX (0.11). FTHFX was incepted earlier than HFCGX: FTHFX (14 years) vs HFCGX (28 years). HFCGX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). HFCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). HFCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: HFCGX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.12 vs. HFCGX (-9.40). HFCGX return over 5 years is better than : 174.88 vs. FTHFX (137.69).
| FTHFX | HFCGX | FTHFX / HFCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.33 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.33 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.888 | -2.293 | 213% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.94B | 498M | 1,995% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.11 | 715% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.12 | -9.40 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.25 | 32.04 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 137.69 | 174.88 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.07 | 53.88 | 171% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers