Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs HFCGX
FTHFX vs HFCGX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs HFCGX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.91
Change-$0.19 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.01B
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Investor
Price$30.80
Change-$0.15 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets511.51M
FTHFX vs HFCGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. HFCGX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and HFCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. HFCGX (512M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than HFCGX: FTHFX (0.82) vs HFCGX (0.12). FTHFX was incepted earlier than HFCGX: FTHFX (14 years) vs HFCGX (29 years). HFCGX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). HFCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). HFCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: HFCGX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.27 vs. HFCGX (-10.62). FTHFX (101.03) and HFCGX (99.89) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FTHFX | HFCGX | FTHFX / HFCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.906 | -2.765 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10B | 512M | 1,953% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.12 | 712% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.27 | -10.62 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.95 | 31.96 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 101.03 | 99.89 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.62 | 55.67 | 236% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers