Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs HFCGX
FTHFX vs HFCGX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs HFCGX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.73
Change-$0.69 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.91B
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Investor
Price$31.38
Change-$0.38 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets514.46M
FTHFX vs HFCGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. HFCGX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and HFCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.91B vs. HFCGX (514M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than HFCGX: FTHFX (0.79) vs HFCGX (0.11). FTHFX was incepted earlier than HFCGX: FTHFX (14 years) vs HFCGX (29 years). HFCGX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). HFCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). HFCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: HFCGX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.78 vs. HFCGX (-6.83). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.55 vs. HFCGX (87.15).
| FTHFX | HFCGX | FTHFX / HFCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.721 | -1.414 | 263% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.91B | 514M | 1,928% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.11 | 710% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.78 | -6.83 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.46 | 36.52 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.55 | 87.15 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.30 | 56.66 | 234% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers