Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs HFCGX
FTHFX vs HFCGX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs HFCGX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.79B
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Investor
Price$31.85
Change-$0.15 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets459.86M
FTHFX vs HFCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. HFCGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and HFCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. HFCGX (460M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than HFCGX: FTHFX (0.70) vs HFCGX (0.11). FTHFX was incepted earlier than HFCGX: FTHFX (14 years) vs HFCGX (29 years). HFCGX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). HFCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). HFCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: HFCGX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.11 vs. HFCGX (-14.61). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 79.21 vs. HFCGX (39.33).
| FTHFX | HFCGX | FTHFX / HFCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.957 | 0.534 | 1,303% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 460M | 2,348% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.11 | 648% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.11 | -14.61 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.76 | 31.69 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.21 | 39.33 | 201% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.87 | 63.99 | 250% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers