Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs HFCGX
FTHFX vs HFCGX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs HFCGX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.91
Change+$0.37 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.66B
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Investor
Price$32.17
Change+$0.21 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets525.58M
FTHFX vs HFCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. HFCGX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and HFCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. HFCGX (526M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than HFCGX: FTHFX (0.76) vs HFCGX (0.11). FTHFX was incepted earlier than HFCGX: FTHFX (14 years) vs HFCGX (29 years). HFCGX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). HFCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). HFCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: HFCGX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.98 vs. HFCGX (-2.95). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 102.86 vs. HFCGX (88.51).
| FTHFX | HFCGX | FTHFX / HFCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.280 | 1.068 | 307% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 526M | 2,034% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.11 | 704% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | -2.95 | -202% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.75 | 51.07 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.86 | 88.51 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.69 | 59.65 | 254% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers