Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs HFCGX
FTHFX vs HFCGX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs HFCGX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.23
Change+$0.07 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.27B
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Investor
Price$33.02
Change+$0.15 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets514.3M
FTHFX vs HFCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. HFCGX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and HFCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. HFCGX (514M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than HFCGX: FTHFX (0.70) vs HFCGX (0.11). FTHFX was incepted earlier than HFCGX: FTHFX (14 years) vs HFCGX (29 years). HFCGX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). HFCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). HFCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: HFCGX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.94 vs. HFCGX (-0.90). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 106.45 vs. HFCGX (70.53).
| FTHFX | HFCGX | FTHFX / HFCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.502 | 3.267 | 321% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 514M | 2,198% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.11 | 659% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.94 | -0.90 | -1,101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.75 | 42.57 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 106.45 | 70.53 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 179.22 | 69.14 | 259% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement