Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs HSZCX
FTHFX vs HSZCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs HSZCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.55
Change-$2.65 (-6.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.94B
FTHFX vs HSZCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. HSZCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and HSZCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.94B vs. HSZCX (5.34M). HSZCX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: HSZCX (2.84) vs FTHFX (0.82). FTHFX was incepted earlier than HSZCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs HSZCX (26 years). HSZCX (6.98) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). HSZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). HSZCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: HSZCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.12 vs. HSZCX (-6.73). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 137.69 vs. HSZCX (10.91).
| FTHFX | HSZCX | FTHFX / HSZCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.50 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 6.98 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.888 | -6.689 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.94B | 5.34M | 186,016% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 2.84 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.12 | -6.73 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.25 | -35.94 | -73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 137.69 | 10.91 | 1,262% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.07 | -75.01 | -123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...