Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs HSZCX
FTHFX vs HSZCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs HSZCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$44.73
Change+$0.57 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.02B
FTHFX vs HSZCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. HSZCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and HSZCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. HSZCX (5.47M). HSZCX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: HSZCX (2.71) vs FTHFX (0.79). FTHFX was incepted earlier than HSZCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs HSZCX (26 years). HSZCX (6.98) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). HSZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). HSZCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: HSZCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.90 vs. HSZCX (-5.51). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 80.01 vs. HSZCX (-27.32).
| FTHFX | HSZCX | FTHFX / HSZCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.50 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 6.98 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.774 | -3.010 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10B | 5.47M | 182,983% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 2.71 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.90 | -5.51 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.29 | -29.64 | -95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.01 | -27.32 | -293% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.94 | -73.78 | -186% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement