Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs IASCX
FTHFX vs IASCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs IASCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.57
Change+$0.21 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.22B
Voya Small Company Port A
Price$12.80
Change+$0.07 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.16M
FTHFX vs IASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. IASCX commentary
Nov 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and IASCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. IASCX (198M). FTHFX (0.70) and IASCX (0.69) have matching dividends . FTHFX was incepted earlier than IASCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs IASCX (17 years). IASCX (1.42) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). IASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 183.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). IASCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: IASCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.46 vs. IASCX (-16.13). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 80.32 vs. IASCX (-20.60).
| FTHFX | IASCX | FTHFX / IASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.36 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.42 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.876 | -9.981 | -109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 198M | 5,657% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.69 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.46 | -16.13 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.63 | 8.91 | 445% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.32 | -20.60 | -390% |
| Returns for 10 years | 164.24 | -34.95 | -470% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement