Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs JSCZX
FTHFX vs JSCZX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs JSCZX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.79B
JPMorgan US Small Company R2
Price$17.04
Change+$0.06 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets905.82M
FTHFX vs JSCZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. JSCZX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and JSCZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. JSCZX (906M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than JSCZX: FTHFX (0.70) vs JSCZX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than JSCZX: FTHFX (14 years) vs JSCZX (14 years). JSCZX (1.49) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). JSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). JSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: JSCZX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.11 vs. JSCZX (-7.24). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 79.21 vs. JSCZX (-6.82).
| FTHFX | JSCZX | FTHFX / JSCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.49 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.49 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.957 | 3.335 | 209% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 906M | 1,192% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.11 | -7.24 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.76 | 10.36 | 355% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.21 | -6.82 | -1,162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.87 | 6.37 | 2,509% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers