Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LMBCX
FTHFX vs LMBCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LMBCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.58
Change+$0.24 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.74B
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity C
Price$12.77
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets119.64M
FTHFX vs LMBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LMBCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and LMBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. LMBCX (120M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LMBCX: FTHFX (0.70) vs LMBCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LMBCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LMBCX (17 years). LMBCX (2.13) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). LMBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). LMBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LMBCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). LMBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.57 vs. FTHFX (-5.71). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 77.88 vs. LMBCX (13.37).
| FTHFX | LMBCX | FTHFX / LMBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.05 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.13 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.429 | 12.324 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 120M | 8,917% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.71 | 3.57 | -160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.08 | 24.24 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.88 | 13.37 | 583% |
| Returns for 10 years | 158.59 | 2.66 | 5,969% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers