Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LZCOX
FTHFX vs LZCOX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LZCOX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.47
Change+$0.27 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.08B
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select Open
Price$9.82
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.04M
FTHFX vs LZCOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LZCOX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and LZCOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. LZCOX (33M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LZCOX: FTHFX (0.69) vs LZCOX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LZCOX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LZCOX (29 years). LZCOX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). LZCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). LZCOX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LZCOX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.91 vs. LZCOX (-18.37). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 94.83 vs. LZCOX (-13.47).
| FTHFX | LZCOX | FTHFX / LZCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.20 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.57 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.917 | -5.486 | -163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 33M | 33,636% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.91 | -18.37 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.30 | -8.48 | -593% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.83 | -13.47 | -704% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.48 | -23.72 | -714% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement