Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs LZCOX
FTHFX vs LZCOX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LZCOX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.55
Change-$2.65 (-6.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.94B
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select Open
Price$8.76
Change-$0.84 (-8.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.16M
FTHFX vs LZCOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LZCOX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and LZCOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.94B vs. LZCOX (34.2M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LZCOX: FTHFX (0.82) vs LZCOX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LZCOX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LZCOX (28 years). LZCOX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). LZCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). LZCOX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LZCOX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.12 vs. LZCOX (-16.88). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 137.69 vs. LZCOX (19.41).
| FTHFX | LZCOX | FTHFX / LZCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.20 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.57 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.888 | -7.603 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.94B | 34.2M | 29,056% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.12 | -16.88 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.25 | -26.38 | -100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 137.69 | 19.41 | 709% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.07 | -32.35 | -285% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...