Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LZCOX
FTHFX vs LZCOX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LZCOX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.73
Change-$0.69 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.11B
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select Open
Price$9.28
Change-$0.20 (-2.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.08M
FTHFX vs LZCOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LZCOX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and LZCOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.1B vs. LZCOX (34.1M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LZCOX: FTHFX (0.79) vs LZCOX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LZCOX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LZCOX (28 years). LZCOX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). LZCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). LZCOX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LZCOX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.23 vs. LZCOX (-18.67). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 96.61 vs. LZCOX (-10.68).
| FTHFX | LZCOX | FTHFX / LZCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.20 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.57 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.202 | -10.683 | 21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.1B | 34.1M | 29,619% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.23 | -18.67 | 1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.67 | -15.79 | -264% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.61 | -10.68 | -905% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.97 | -35.60 | -382% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers