Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LZCOX
FTHFX vs LZCOX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LZCOX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.79B
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select Open
Price$9.48
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.52M
FTHFX vs LZCOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LZCOX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and LZCOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. LZCOX (31.5M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LZCOX: FTHFX (0.70) vs LZCOX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LZCOX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LZCOX (29 years). LZCOX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). LZCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). LZCOX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LZCOX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.11 vs. LZCOX (-20.60). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 79.21 vs. LZCOX (-23.73).
| FTHFX | LZCOX | FTHFX / LZCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.20 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.57 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.957 | -8.758 | -79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 31.5M | 34,286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.11 | -20.60 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.76 | -16.40 | -224% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.21 | -23.73 | -334% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.87 | -28.31 | -565% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement