Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs MNSQX
FTHFX vs MNSQX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs MNSQX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.29
Change+$0.40 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.17B
Invesco Main Street Small Cap R5
Price$23.55
Change+$0.23 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.25B
FTHFX vs MNSQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. MNSQX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and MNSQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. MNSQX (2.25B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than MNSQX: FTHFX (0.69) vs MNSQX (0.17). FTHFX was incepted earlier than MNSQX: FTHFX (14 years) vs MNSQX (6 years). MNSQX (0.76) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX (41.00) and MNSQX (41.00) have comparable annual turnover. FTHFX (1000000) and MNSQX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.41 vs. MNSQX (2.19). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 96.41 vs. MNSQX (48.34).
| FTHFX | MNSQX | FTHFX / MNSQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.76 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.76 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.841 | 5.330 | 185% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 2.25B | 497% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.17 | 405% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.41 | 2.19 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.69 | 39.98 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.41 | 48.34 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.35 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement