Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs NSCAX
FTHFX vs NSCAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$41.02
Change+$3.18 (+8.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.68B
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps A
Price$43.12
Change+$2.83 (+7.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets214.4M
FTHFX vs NSCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NSCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 8.68B vs. NSCAX (214M). FTHFX (0.82) and NSCAX (0.80) have matching dividends . FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSCAX (20 years). NSCAX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSCAX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -16.40 vs. NSCAX (-23.86). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 77.25 vs. NSCAX (29.64).
| FTHFX | NSCAX | FTHFX / NSCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.20 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.35 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.689 | -16.911 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.68B | 214M | 4,056% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.80 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.40 | -23.86 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.82 | -12.90 | -107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.25 | 29.64 | 261% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.45 | -8.64 | -769% |