Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCAX
FTHFX vs NSCAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.16
Change+$0.61 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.26B
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps A
Price$50.82
Change+$0.10 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.22M
FTHFX vs NSCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCAX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NSCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. NSCAX (259M). NSCAX (0.73) and FTHFX (0.70) have matching dividends . FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSCAX (21 years). NSCAX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSCAX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.53 vs. NSCAX (-10.73). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 103.71 vs. NSCAX (43.50).
| FTHFX | NSCAX | FTHFX / NSCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.20 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.35 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.502 | 4.805 | 219% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 259M | 4,363% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.73 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.53 | -10.73 | -79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.33 | 20.00 | 282% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.71 | 43.50 | 238% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.64 | 29.69 | 602% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers