Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCRX
FTHFX vs NSCRX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCRX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.29
Change+$0.40 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.17B
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps I
Price$54.16
Change+$0.68 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets258.67M
FTHFX vs NSCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCRX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. NSCRX (259M). NSCRX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSCRX (0.95) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCRX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSCRX (21 years). NSCRX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSCRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSCRX (100000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.41 vs. NSCRX (-12.81). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 96.41 vs. NSCRX (44.27).
| FTHFX | NSCRX | FTHFX / NSCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.95 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.10 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.841 | 4.250 | 232% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 259M | 4,324% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.95 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.41 | -12.81 | -19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.69 | 24.71 | 234% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.41 | 44.27 | 218% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.35 | 30.84 | 556% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers