Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs NSMVX
FTHFX vs NSMVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSMVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.20
Change+$0.63 (+1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.82B
North Star Micro Cap I
Price$38.36
Change+$0.48 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.81M
FTHFX vs NSMVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSMVX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NSMVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.82B vs. NSMVX (106M). FTHFX (0.82) and NSMVX (0.80) have matching dividends . FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSMVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSMVX (12 years). NSMVX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NSMVX (26.00). NSMVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSMVX (5000) vs FTHFX (1000000). NSMVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.58 vs. FTHFX (-6.00). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 134.22 vs. NSMVX (125.92).
| FTHFX | NSMVX | FTHFX / NSMVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.39 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.39 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.275 | -9.400 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 5000 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.82B | 106M | 9,260% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.80 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.00 | -3.58 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.74 | 3.65 | 651% |
| Returns for 5 years | 134.22 | 125.92 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.21 | 41.14 | 219% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...