Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs ORSAX
FTHFX vs ORSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs ORSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.15
Change+$0.49 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.54B
North Square Dynamic Sm Cp A
Price$15.89
Change+$0.19 (+1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets438.57M
FTHFX vs ORSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. ORSAX (439M). FTHFX was incepted earlier than ORSAX: FTHFX (13 years) vs ORSAX (2 years). ORSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 188.00 vs. FTHFX (35.00). ORSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: ORSAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). ORSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.99 vs. FTHFX (12.26). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 81.42 vs. ORSAX (22.04).
| FTHFX | ORSAX | FTHFX / ORSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 2 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.730 | 4.250 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 439M | 2,392% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.26 | 16.99 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.22 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.42 | 22.04 | 369% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.37 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FLCH | 19.38 | 0.45 | +2.38% |
| Franklin FTSE China ETF | |||
| ICVT | 88.03 | 0.62 | +0.71% |
| iShares Convertible Bond ETF | |||
| ADFI | 8.48 | 0.02 | +0.22% |
| Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | |||
| THYF | 52.54 | 0.03 | +0.05% |
| T. Rowe Price U.S. High Yield ETF | |||
| WEIX | 26.11 | N/A | N/A |
| Dynamic Short Short-Term Volatility Futures ETF | |||