Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs PASVX
FTHFX vs PASVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs PASVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.71
Change-$0.20 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.01B
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Adv
Price$49.15
Change-$0.13 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.33B
FTHFX vs PASVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. PASVX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and PASVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. PASVX (9.33B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than PASVX: FTHFX (0.82) vs PASVX (0.37). FTHFX was incepted earlier than PASVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs PASVX (25 years). PASVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. PASVX (32.40). PASVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: PASVX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.27 vs. PASVX (-6.52). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 101.03 vs. PASVX (34.34).
| FTHFX | PASVX | FTHFX / PASVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.906 | -6.431 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10B | 9.33B | 107% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.37 | 222% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.27 | -6.52 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.95 | -4.25 | -869% |
| Returns for 5 years | 101.03 | 34.34 | 294% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.62 | 7.29 | 1,806% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers