Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs PASVX
FTHFX vs PASVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs PASVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$39.57
Change-$1.45 (-3.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.41B
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Adv
Price$44.79
Change-$1.97 (-4.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.97B
FTHFX vs PASVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. PASVX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and PASVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX (9.41B) and PASVX (8.97B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FTHFX pays higher dividends than PASVX: FTHFX (0.82) vs PASVX (0.36). FTHFX was incepted earlier than PASVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs PASVX (25 years). PASVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. PASVX (32.40). PASVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: PASVX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.51 vs. PASVX (-9.67). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 92.14 vs. PASVX (32.16).
| FTHFX | PASVX | FTHFX / PASVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.687 | -11.288 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.41B | 8.97B | 105% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.36 | 229% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.51 | -9.67 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.93 | -14.50 | -165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.14 | 32.16 | 286% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.25 | 1.11 | 7,306% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...