Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs PRSVX
FTHFX vs PRSVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs PRSVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.07
Change-$0.42 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.25B
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value
Price$45.82
Change-$0.27 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.81B
FTHFX vs PRSVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. PRSVX commentary
Apr 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and PRSVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX (9.25B) and PRSVX (8.81B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . PRSVX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: PRSVX (0.88) vs FTHFX (0.82). FTHFX was incepted earlier than PRSVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs PRSVX (37 years). PRSVX (0.80) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. PRSVX (32.40). PRSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: PRSVX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.85 vs. PRSVX (-8.11). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 95.40 vs. PRSVX (35.50).
| FTHFX | PRSVX | FTHFX / PRSVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.80 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.80 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.854 | -12.692 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.25B | 8.81B | 105% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.88 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.85 | -8.11 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.05 | -16.04 | -131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 95.40 | 35.50 | 269% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.32 | 2.53 | 3,177% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers