Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs PRSVX
FTHFX vs PRSVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs PRSVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.72
Change-$0.48 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.62B
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value
Price$53.03
Change-$0.45 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.85B
FTHFX vs PRSVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. PRSVX commentary
Jul 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and PRSVX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. PRSVX (9.85B). PRSVX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: PRSVX (0.85) vs FTHFX (0.76). FTHFX was incepted earlier than PRSVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs PRSVX (37 years). PRSVX (0.77) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. PRSVX (32.40). PRSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: PRSVX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.03 vs. PRSVX (-0.84). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 103.31 vs. PRSVX (36.88).
| FTHFX | PRSVX | FTHFX / PRSVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.77 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.77 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.862 | 0.455 | 630% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 9.85B | 108% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.85 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.03 | -0.84 | -361% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.68 | 8.32 | 585% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.31 | 36.88 | 280% |
| Returns for 10 years | 145.26 | 16.37 | 887% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers