Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs PSCNX
FTHFX vs PSCNX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs PSCNX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.29
Change+$0.40 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.17B
Penn Capital Special Sits Sm Cp Eq Inst
Price$17.96
Change+$0.04 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.77M
FTHFX vs PSCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. PSCNX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and PSCNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. PSCNX (74.8M). PSCNX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: PSCNX (1.36) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than PSCNX: FTHFX (14 years) vs PSCNX (10 years). PSCNX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). PSCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). PSCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: PSCNX (10000) vs FTHFX (1000000). PSCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.36 vs. FTHFX (2.41). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 96.41 vs. PSCNX (58.70).
| FTHFX | PSCNX | FTHFX / PSCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.09 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.59 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.841 | 13.922 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 10000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 74.8M | 14,973% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.36 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.41 | 21.36 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.69 | 44.61 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.41 | 58.70 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.35 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement