Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs PSCNX
FTHFX vs PSCNX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs PSCNX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.73
Change-$0.69 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.11B
Penn Capital Special Sits Sm Cp Eq Inst
Price$15.33
Change-$0.38 (-2.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets58.88M
FTHFX vs PSCNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. PSCNX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and PSCNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.1B vs. PSCNX (58.9M). PSCNX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: PSCNX (1.64) vs FTHFX (0.79). FTHFX was incepted earlier than PSCNX: FTHFX (14 years) vs PSCNX (10 years). PSCNX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). PSCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). PSCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: PSCNX (10000) vs FTHFX (1000000). PSCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.68 vs. FTHFX (-0.23). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 96.61 vs. PSCNX (73.72).
| FTHFX | PSCNX | FTHFX / PSCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.09 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.59 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.202 | -0.127 | 1,732% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 10000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.1B | 58.9M | 17,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.64 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.23 | 10.68 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.67 | 21.85 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.61 | 73.72 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers