Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs PSCNX
FTHFX vs PSCNX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs PSCNX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.82
Change-$0.16 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.19B
Penn Capital Special Sits Sm Cp Eq Inst
Price$18.18
Change+$0.09 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.58M
FTHFX vs PSCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. PSCNX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and PSCNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. PSCNX (69.6M). PSCNX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: PSCNX (1.46) vs FTHFX (0.74). FTHFX was incepted earlier than PSCNX: FTHFX (14 years) vs PSCNX (10 years). PSCNX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). PSCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). PSCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: PSCNX (10000) vs FTHFX (1000000). PSCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.35 vs. FTHFX (5.29). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 97.07 vs. PSCNX (73.15).
| FTHFX | PSCNX | FTHFX / PSCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.09 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.59 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.040 | 15.003 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 10000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 69.6M | 16,092% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 1.46 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.29 | 22.35 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.25 | 31.31 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.07 | 73.15 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 179.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement