Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs PSCNX
FTHFX vs PSCNX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs PSCNX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.91
Change-$0.19 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.01B
Penn Capital Special Sits Sm Cp Eq Inst
Price$14.89
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets56.68M
FTHFX vs PSCNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. PSCNX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and PSCNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. PSCNX (56.7M). PSCNX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: PSCNX (1.76) vs FTHFX (0.82). FTHFX was incepted earlier than PSCNX: FTHFX (14 years) vs PSCNX (9 years). PSCNX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). PSCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). PSCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: PSCNX (10000) vs FTHFX (1000000). PSCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.28 vs. FTHFX (-3.27). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 101.03 vs. PSCNX (68.15).
| FTHFX | PSCNX | FTHFX / PSCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.09 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.59 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.906 | -5.531 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 10000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10B | 56.7M | 17,637% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.76 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.27 | 2.28 | -144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.95 | 9.58 | 385% |
| Returns for 5 years | 101.03 | 68.15 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.62 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement