Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs PSCNX
FTHFX vs PSCNX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs PSCNX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.20
Change+$0.63 (+1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.82B
Penn Capital Special Sits Sm Cp Eq Inst
Price$14.80
Change+$0.30 (+2.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.23M
FTHFX vs PSCNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. PSCNX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and PSCNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.82B vs. PSCNX (53.2M). PSCNX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: PSCNX (1.71) vs FTHFX (0.82). FTHFX was incepted earlier than PSCNX: FTHFX (14 years) vs PSCNX (9 years). PSCNX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). PSCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). PSCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: PSCNX (10000) vs FTHFX (1000000). PSCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.81 vs. FTHFX (-6.00). FTHFX (134.22) and PSCNX (127.89) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FTHFX | PSCNX | FTHFX / PSCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.09 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.59 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.275 | -7.819 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 10000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.82B | 53.2M | 18,451% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.71 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.00 | -0.81 | 743% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.74 | -9.68 | -245% |
| Returns for 5 years | 134.22 | 127.89 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...