Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs PXSCX
FTHFX vs PXSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs PXSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.20
Change+$0.35 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.7B
Impax Small Cap Investor
Price$16.08
Change+$0.22 (+1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets625.23M
FTHFX vs PXSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. PXSCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and PXSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.7B vs. PXSCX (625M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than PXSCX: FTHFX (0.82) vs PXSCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than PXSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs PXSCX (17 years). PXSCX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). PXSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). PXSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: PXSCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). PXSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.53 vs. FTHFX (-5.34). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 97.33 vs. PXSCX (35.93).
| FTHFX | PXSCX | FTHFX / PXSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.658 | -8.746 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.7B | 625M | 1,552% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.34 | -3.53 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.91 | 12.08 | 281% |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.33 | 35.93 | 271% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.18 | 13.24 | 960% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...