Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs PXSCX
FTHFX vs PXSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs PXSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$44.57
Change+$0.66 (+1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.99B
Impax Small Cap Investor
Price$16.46
Change+$0.19 (+1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets639.74M
FTHFX vs PXSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. PXSCX commentary
Jun 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and PXSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.99B vs. PXSCX (640M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than PXSCX: FTHFX (0.79) vs PXSCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than PXSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs PXSCX (17 years). PXSCX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). PXSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). PXSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: PXSCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). PXSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.37 vs. FTHFX (-0.95). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 94.77 vs. PXSCX (34.05).
| FTHFX | PXSCX | FTHFX / PXSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.15 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.15 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.325 | -6.387 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.99B | 640M | 1,561% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.95 | 0.37 | -258% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.53 | 13.62 | 283% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.77 | 34.05 | 278% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.88 | 12.70 | 1,038% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement