Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs PXSCX
FTHFX vs PXSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs PXSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.29
Change+$0.40 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.17B
Impax Small Cap Investor
Price$18.86
Change+$0.10 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets727.78M
FTHFX vs PXSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. PXSCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and PXSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. PXSCX (728M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than PXSCX: FTHFX (0.69) vs PXSCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than PXSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs PXSCX (18 years). PXSCX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). PXSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). PXSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: PXSCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). PXSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.89 vs. FTHFX (2.41). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 96.41 vs. PXSCX (39.25).
| FTHFX | PXSCX | FTHFX / PXSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.15 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.15 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.841 | 8.516 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 728M | 1,538% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.41 | 7.89 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.69 | 35.20 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.41 | 39.25 | 246% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.35 | 40.26 | 426% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement