Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QASCX
FTHFX vs QASCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QASCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.63
Change+$0.06 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.23B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core A
Price$29.20
Change+$0.15 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.55B
FTHFX vs QASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QASCX commentary
Nov 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and QASCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. QASCX (1.55B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QASCX: FTHFX (0.69) vs QASCX (0.11). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QASCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QASCX (20 years). QASCX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). QASCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QASCX (1500) vs FTHFX (1000000). QASCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.35 vs. FTHFX (-4.43). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 81.07 vs. QASCX (40.02).
| FTHFX | QASCX | FTHFX / QASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.14 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.34 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.339 | 14.152 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1500 | 66,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 1.55B | 724% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.11 | 638% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.43 | 6.35 | -70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.82 | 48.84 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.07 | 40.02 | 203% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.48 | 87.99 | 188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement