Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs QASCX
FTHFX vs QASCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QASCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.20
Change+$0.35 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.7B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core A
Price$23.40
Change+$0.30 (+1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
FTHFX vs QASCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QASCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and QASCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.7B vs. QASCX (1.27B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QASCX: FTHFX (0.82) vs QASCX (0.14). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QASCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QASCX (20 years). QASCX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). QASCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QASCX (1500) vs FTHFX (1000000). QASCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.66 vs. FTHFX (-5.34). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 97.33 vs. QASCX (52.69).
| FTHFX | QASCX | FTHFX / QASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.14 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.33 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.658 | -9.695 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1500 | 66,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.7B | 1.27B | 765% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.14 | 589% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.34 | 1.66 | -321% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.91 | 15.63 | 217% |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.33 | 52.69 | 185% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.18 | 48.06 | 265% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers