Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QASCX
FTHFX vs QASCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QASCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.98
Change+$0.13 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.31B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core A
Price$28.51
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.51B
FTHFX vs QASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QASCX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and QASCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. QASCX (1.51B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QASCX: FTHFX (0.70) vs QASCX (0.11). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QASCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QASCX (20 years). QASCX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). QASCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QASCX (1500) vs FTHFX (1000000). QASCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.16 vs. FTHFX (3.76). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 107.61 vs. QASCX (64.52).
| FTHFX | QASCX | FTHFX / QASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.14 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.33 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.753 | 11.298 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1500 | 66,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 1.51B | 746% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.11 | 628% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.76 | 13.16 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.60 | 46.46 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 107.61 | 64.52 | 167% |
| Returns for 10 years | 177.04 | 91.48 | 194% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement