Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs QASCX
FTHFX vs QASCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QASCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$38.92
Change-$1.63 (-4.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.97B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core A
Price$21.00
Change-$0.95 (-4.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.16B
FTHFX vs QASCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QASCX commentary
Apr 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and QASCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 8.97B vs. QASCX (1.16B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QASCX: FTHFX (0.82) vs QASCX (0.14). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QASCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QASCX (20 years). QASCX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). QASCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QASCX (1500) vs FTHFX (1000000). QASCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.18 vs. FTHFX (-13.58). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 114.14 vs. QASCX (78.59).
| FTHFX | QASCX | FTHFX / QASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.14 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.33 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.311 | -17.905 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1500 | 66,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.97B | 1.16B | 775% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.14 | 598% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.58 | -8.18 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.52 | -8.30 | -187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 114.14 | 78.59 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.33 | 34.00 | 216% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...