Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QCSCX
FTHFX vs QCSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QCSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.51
Change-$0.16 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.78B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core C
Price$21.40
Change-$0.04 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.48B
FTHFX vs QCSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QCSCX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and QCSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. QCSCX (1.48B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QCSCX: FTHFX (0.76) vs QCSCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QCSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QCSCX (20 years). QCSCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QCSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). QCSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QCSCX (1500) vs FTHFX (1000000). QCSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.79 vs. FTHFX (0.09). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.71 vs. QCSCX (41.61).
| FTHFX | QCSCX | FTHFX / QCSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.99 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.99 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.954 | 2.095 | 236% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1500 | 66,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 1.48B | 730% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.09 | 4.79 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.71 | 23.79 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.71 | 41.61 | 225% |
| Returns for 10 years | 150.50 | 48.07 | 313% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement