Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QCSCX
FTHFX vs QCSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QCSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.11
Change+$0.54 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.26B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core C
Price$23.36
Change+$0.21 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
FTHFX vs QCSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QCSCX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and QCSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. QCSCX (1.52B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QCSCX: FTHFX (0.70) vs QCSCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QCSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QCSCX (20 years). QCSCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QCSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). QCSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QCSCX (1500) vs FTHFX (1000000). QCSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.74 vs. FTHFX (2.48). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 114.02 vs. QCSCX (60.33).
| FTHFX | QCSCX | FTHFX / QCSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.99 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.99 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.326 | 11.238 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1500 | 66,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 1.52B | 746% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.48 | 12.74 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.88 | 55.73 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 114.02 | 60.33 | 189% |
| Returns for 10 years | 189.61 | 80.39 | 236% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement