Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs QCSCX
FTHFX vs QCSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QCSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.09
Change+$0.52 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.06B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core C
Price$17.48
Change+$0.20 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
FTHFX vs QCSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QCSCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and QCSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.06B vs. QCSCX (1.16B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QCSCX: FTHFX (0.82) vs QCSCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QCSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QCSCX (20 years). QCSCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QCSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). QCSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QCSCX (1500) vs FTHFX (1000000). QCSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.04 vs. FTHFX (-11.12). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 85.35 vs. QCSCX (38.91).
| FTHFX | QCSCX | FTHFX / QCSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.99 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.99 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.880 | -17.714 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1500 | 66,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.06B | 1.16B | 784% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.12 | -8.04 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.34 | -8.81 | -219% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.35 | 38.91 | 219% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.85 | 17.15 | 436% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...