Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QCSCX
FTHFX vs QCSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QCSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.73
Change-$0.69 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.11B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core C
Price$19.93
Change-$0.34 (-1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.34B
FTHFX vs QCSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QCSCX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and QCSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.1B vs. QCSCX (1.34B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QCSCX: FTHFX (0.79) vs QCSCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QCSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QCSCX (20 years). QCSCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QCSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). QCSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QCSCX (1500) vs FTHFX (1000000). QCSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.86 vs. FTHFX (-0.23). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 96.61 vs. QCSCX (44.27).
| FTHFX | QCSCX | FTHFX / QCSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.99 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.99 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.202 | -3.476 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1500 | 66,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.1B | 1.34B | 755% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.23 | 8.86 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.67 | 25.67 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.61 | 44.27 | 218% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.97 | 37.05 | 367% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers