Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QISCX
FTHFX vs QISCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QISCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$45.16
Change+$0.49 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.15B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core IS
Price$26.30
Change+$0.34 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.36B
FTHFX vs QISCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QISCX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and QISCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.2B vs. QISCX (1.36B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QISCX: FTHFX (0.79) vs QISCX (0.37). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QISCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QISCX (20 years). QISCX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QISCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and QISCX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. QISCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.71 vs. FTHFX (1.24). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 98.82 vs. QISCX (59.67).
| FTHFX | QISCX | FTHFX / QISCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.89 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.98 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.651 | -3.170 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.2B | 1.36B | 752% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.37 | 210% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.24 | 11.71 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.94 | 26.65 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.82 | 59.67 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.24 | 64.37 | 219% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement