Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs QISCX
FTHFX vs QISCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QISCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$42.85
Change+$0.04 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.69B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core IS
Price$24.23
Change+$0.19 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
FTHFX vs QISCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QISCX commentary
May 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and QISCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.69B vs. QISCX (1.26B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QISCX: FTHFX (0.82) vs QISCX (0.40). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QISCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QISCX (20 years). QISCX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QISCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and QISCX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. QISCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.60 vs. FTHFX (-5.34). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 97.14 vs. QISCX (54.60).
| FTHFX | QISCX | FTHFX / QISCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.89 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.98 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.746 | -10.332 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.69B | 1.26B | 771% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.40 | 207% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.34 | 0.60 | -891% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.96 | 10.75 | 288% |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.14 | 54.60 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 126.51 | 52.59 | 241% |