Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs QISCX
FTHFX vs QISCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QISCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.09
Change+$0.52 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.06B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core IS
Price$22.38
Change+$0.25 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
FTHFX vs QISCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QISCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and QISCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.06B vs. QISCX (1.16B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QISCX: FTHFX (0.82) vs QISCX (0.39). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QISCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QISCX (20 years). QISCX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QISCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and QISCX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. QISCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.97 vs. FTHFX (-11.12). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 85.35 vs. QISCX (52.54).
| FTHFX | QISCX | FTHFX / QISCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.89 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.98 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.880 | -17.456 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.06B | 1.16B | 784% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.39 | 211% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.12 | -6.97 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.34 | -4.95 | -391% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.35 | 52.54 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.85 | 38.66 | 194% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers