Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QISCX
FTHFX vs QISCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QISCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$44.16
Change+$0.05 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.02B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core IS
Price$25.46
Change-$0.06 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.33B
FTHFX vs QISCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QISCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and QISCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. QISCX (1.33B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QISCX: FTHFX (0.79) vs QISCX (0.37). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QISCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QISCX (20 years). QISCX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QISCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and QISCX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. QISCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.75 vs. FTHFX (-1.67). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 79.80 vs. QISCX (42.48).
| FTHFX | QISCX | FTHFX / QISCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.89 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.98 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.884 | -4.812 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10B | 1.33B | 750% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.37 | 210% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.67 | 6.75 | -25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.39 | 14.94 | 197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.80 | 42.48 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.67 | 61.29 | 223% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement