Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RBRCX
FTHFX vs RBRCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RBRCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.16
Change+$0.61 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.27B
FTHFX vs RBRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RBRCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and RBRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. RBRCX (32.8M). RBRCX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: RBRCX (0.80) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RBRCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RBRCX (9 years). RBRCX (3.07) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RBRCX (37.00). RBRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RBRCX (250000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.53 vs. RBRCX (-12.25). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 103.71 vs. RBRCX (-51.84).
| FTHFX | RBRCX | FTHFX / RBRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.83 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 3.07 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.502 | -0.724 | -1,451% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250000 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 32.8M | 34,451% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.80 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.53 | -12.25 | -70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.33 | -18.69 | -301% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.71 | -51.84 | -200% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.64 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement