Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RBRCX
FTHFX vs RBRCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RBRCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.75
Change-$0.54 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.11B
FTHFX vs RBRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RBRCX commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and RBRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. RBRCX (33.5M). RBRCX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: RBRCX (0.84) vs FTHFX (0.74). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RBRCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RBRCX (9 years). RBRCX (38.30) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RBRCX (37.00). RBRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RBRCX (250000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.63 vs. RBRCX (-11.68). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 92.73 vs. RBRCX (-55.33).
| FTHFX | RBRCX | FTHFX / RBRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.83 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 38.30 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.520 | -1.592 | -535% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250000 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 33.5M | 33,134% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.84 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.63 | -11.68 | -74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.76 | -28.44 | -143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.73 | -55.33 | -168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 158.63 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement