Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs RBRCX
FTHFX vs RBRCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RBRCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$41.58
Change+$0.83 (+2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.26B
FTHFX vs RBRCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RBRCX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and RBRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.26B vs. RBRCX (32M). RBRCX (0.86) and FTHFX (0.82) have matching dividends . FTHFX was incepted earlier than RBRCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RBRCX (8 years). RBRCX (38.30) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RBRCX (37.00). RBRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RBRCX (250000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.02 vs. RBRCX (-22.68). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 99.44 vs. RBRCX (-46.59).
| FTHFX | RBRCX | FTHFX / RBRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.83 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 38.30 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.282 | -13.242 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250000 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.26B | 32M | 28,950% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.86 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.02 | -22.68 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.86 | -34.53 | -63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.44 | -46.59 | -213% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers