Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs RLSMX
FTHFX vs RLSMX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RLSMX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.06
Change-$0.14 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.79B
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select R6
Price$10.64
Change-$0.06 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.99M
FTHFX vs RLSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RLSMX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and RLSMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.79B vs. RLSMX (35M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than RLSMX: FTHFX (0.82) vs RLSMX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RLSMX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RLSMX (5 years). RLSMX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). RLSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and RLSMX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.88 vs. RLSMX (-17.77). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 98.29 vs. RLSMX (-0.56).
| FTHFX | RLSMX | FTHFX / RLSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.90 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.23 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.196 | -11.407 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.79B | 35M | 27,980% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.88 | -17.77 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.82 | -14.19 | -245% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.29 | -0.56 | -17,536% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers