Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RLSMX
FTHFX vs RLSMX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RLSMX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$44.33
Change+$0.54 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.98B
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select R6
Price$10.88
Change+$0.19 (+1.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.89M
FTHFX vs RLSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RLSMX commentary
Jun 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and RLSMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.98B vs. RLSMX (33.9M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than RLSMX: FTHFX (0.79) vs RLSMX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RLSMX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RLSMX (5 years). RLSMX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). RLSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and RLSMX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.58 vs. RLSMX (-17.52). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 83.63 vs. RLSMX (-10.23).
| FTHFX | RLSMX | FTHFX / RLSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.90 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.18 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.589 | -10.991 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.98B | 33.9M | 29,451% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.58 | -17.52 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.41 | -19.44 | -151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.63 | -10.23 | -818% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.20 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers