Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RLSMX
FTHFX vs RLSMX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RLSMX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.58
Change+$0.24 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.74B
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select R6
Price$11.02
Change+$0.07 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.35M
FTHFX vs RLSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RLSMX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and RLSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. RLSMX (31.3M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than RLSMX: FTHFX (0.70) vs RLSMX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RLSMX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RLSMX (6 years). RLSMX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). RLSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and RLSMX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.71 vs. RLSMX (-18.13). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 77.88 vs. RLSMX (-18.52).
| FTHFX | RLSMX | FTHFX / RLSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.90 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.18 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.429 | -8.243 | -78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 31.3M | 34,185% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.71 | -18.13 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.08 | -11.06 | -326% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.88 | -18.52 | -421% |
| Returns for 10 years | 158.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement