Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs RLSMX
FTHFX vs RLSMX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RLSMX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.55
Change-$2.65 (-6.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.94B
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select R6
Price$10.12
Change-$0.97 (-8.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.16M
FTHFX vs RLSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RLSMX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and RLSMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.94B vs. RLSMX (34.2M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than RLSMX: FTHFX (0.82) vs RLSMX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RLSMX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RLSMX (5 years). RLSMX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). RLSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and RLSMX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.12 vs. RLSMX (-15.02). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 137.69 vs. RLSMX (27.27).
| FTHFX | RLSMX | FTHFX / RLSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.90 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.23 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.888 | -7.660 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.94B | 34.2M | 29,056% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.12 | -15.02 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.25 | -21.74 | -121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 137.69 | 27.27 | 505% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...