Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RTSAX
FTHFX vs RTSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RTSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.98
Change+$0.13 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.31B
Russell Inv Tax-Managed US Mid&Sm Cap A
Price$40.55
Change-$0.10 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.78B
FTHFX vs RTSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RTSAX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and RTSAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. RTSAX (1.78B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than RTSAX: FTHFX (0.70) vs RTSAX (0.49). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RTSAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RTSAX (15 years). RTSAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). RTSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). RTSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RTSAX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.76 vs. RTSAX (2.58). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 107.61 vs. RTSAX (53.99).
| FTHFX | RTSAX | FTHFX / RTSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.49 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.51 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.753 | 3.286 | 297% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 1.78B | 636% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.49 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.76 | 2.58 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.60 | 29.02 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 107.61 | 53.99 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | 177.04 | 103.62 | 171% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement