Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RTSAX
FTHFX vs RTSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RTSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.58
Change+$0.24 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.74B
Russell Inv Tax-Managed US Mid&Sm Cap A
Price$39.02
Change+$0.02 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.72B
FTHFX vs RTSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RTSAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and RTSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. RTSAX (1.72B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than RTSAX: FTHFX (0.70) vs RTSAX (0.49). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RTSAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RTSAX (15 years). RTSAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). RTSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). RTSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RTSAX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). RTSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.37 vs. FTHFX (-5.71). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 77.88 vs. RTSAX (29.66).
| FTHFX | RTSAX | FTHFX / RTSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.49 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.51 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.429 | -0.611 | -1,052% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 1.72B | 623% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.49 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.71 | -4.37 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.08 | 19.10 | 189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.88 | 29.66 | 263% |
| Returns for 10 years | 158.59 | 92.67 | 171% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement