Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RUSRX
FTHFX vs RUSRX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RUSRX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.82
Change-$0.16 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.19B
Lazard US Systematic Small Cap Eq R6
Price$10.51
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.75M
FTHFX vs RUSRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. RUSRX (46.8M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than RUSRX: FTHFX (0.74) vs RUSRX (0.57). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RUSRX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RUSRX (3 years). RUSRX (4.26) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). RUSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and RUSRX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.29 vs. RUSRX (-4.89).
| FTHFX | RUSRX | FTHFX / RUSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.99 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 4.26 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.040 | -5.655 | -178% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 46.8M | 23,932% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.57 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.29 | -4.89 | -108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.25 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.07 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 179.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement