Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs RYPCX
FTHFX vs RYPCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RYPCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.06
Change-$0.14 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.78B
Royce Small-Cap Fund Consult
Price$6.37
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.63B
FTHFX vs RYPCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RYPCX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and RYPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.78B vs. RYPCX (1.63B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than RYPCX: FTHFX (0.82) vs RYPCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RYPCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RYPCX (28 years). RYPCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RYPCX (37.00). RYPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RYPCX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.58 vs. RYPCX (-14.04). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 98.94 vs. RYPCX (6.34).
| FTHFX | RYPCX | FTHFX / RYPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.94 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.94 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.888 | -7.815 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.78B | 1.63B | 601% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.58 | -14.04 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.26 | 3.92 | 900% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.94 | 6.34 | 1,560% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.71 | -42.97 | -302% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...