Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RYPCX
FTHFX vs RYPCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RYPCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.73
Change-$0.69 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.11B
Royce Small-Cap Fund Consult
Price$6.60
Change-$0.13 (-1.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.67B
FTHFX vs RYPCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RYPCX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and RYPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.1B vs. RYPCX (1.67B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than RYPCX: FTHFX (0.79) vs RYPCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RYPCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RYPCX (28 years). RYPCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RYPCX (37.00). RYPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RYPCX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.23 vs. RYPCX (-9.96). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 96.61 vs. RYPCX (5.77).
| FTHFX | RYPCX | FTHFX / RYPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.95 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.95 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.202 | -4.486 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.1B | 1.67B | 603% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.23 | -9.96 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.67 | 11.68 | 357% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.61 | 5.77 | 1,675% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.97 | -41.70 | -326% |