Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RYPCX
FTHFX vs RYPCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RYPCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.85
Change+$0.13 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.62B
Royce Small-Cap Fund Consult
Price$7.02
Change-$0.01 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.77B
FTHFX vs RYPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RYPCX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and RYPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. RYPCX (1.77B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than RYPCX: FTHFX (0.76) vs RYPCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RYPCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RYPCX (28 years). RYPCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RYPCX (37.00). RYPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RYPCX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.32 vs. RYPCX (-7.75). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 95.44 vs. RYPCX (6.53).
| FTHFX | RYPCX | FTHFX / RYPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.95 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.95 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.862 | 1.592 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 1.77B | 599% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.32 | -7.75 | -30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.08 | 18.18 | 259% |
| Returns for 5 years | 95.44 | 6.53 | 1,463% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.78 | -35.66 | -406% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement