Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RYPCX
FTHFX vs RYPCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RYPCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.42
Change-$0.02 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.31B
Royce Small-Cap Fund Consult
Price$7.40
Change+$0.03 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
FTHFX vs RYPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RYPCX commentary
Oct 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and RYPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. RYPCX (1.81B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than RYPCX: FTHFX (0.69) vs RYPCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RYPCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RYPCX (28 years). RYPCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RYPCX (37.00). RYPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RYPCX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.87 vs. RYPCX (-0.94). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 107.57 vs. RYPCX (9.63).
| FTHFX | RYPCX | FTHFX / RYPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.95 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.95 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.052 | 7.091 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 1.81B | 624% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.87 | -0.94 | -413% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.18 | 23.75 | 232% |
| Returns for 5 years | 107.57 | 9.63 | 1,117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 180.32 | -26.00 | -694% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement