Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RYPCX
FTHFX vs RYPCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RYPCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.79B
Royce Small-Cap Fund Consult
Price$7.05
Change+$0.03 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7B
FTHFX vs RYPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RYPCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and RYPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. RYPCX (1.7B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than RYPCX: FTHFX (0.70) vs RYPCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RYPCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RYPCX (28 years). RYPCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RYPCX (37.00). RYPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RYPCX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.11 vs. RYPCX (-9.03). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 79.21 vs. RYPCX (-9.27).
| FTHFX | RYPCX | FTHFX / RYPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.95 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.95 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.957 | 2.026 | 343% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 1.7B | 635% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.11 | -9.03 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.76 | 10.33 | 356% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.21 | -9.27 | -855% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.87 | -31.02 | -515% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement