Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SBHVX
FTHFX vs SBHVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SBHVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.91
Change+$0.37 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.66B
Segall Bryant & Hamill Sm Cp Val Ins
Price$15.12
Change+$0.10 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets411.69M
FTHFX vs SBHVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SBHVX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and SBHVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. SBHVX (412M). SBHVX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: SBHVX (1.09) vs FTHFX (0.76). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SBHVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SBHVX (12 years). SBHVX (1.00) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. SBHVX (33.00). SBHVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SBHVX (250000) vs FTHFX (1000000). SBHVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.06 vs. FTHFX (5.98). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 102.86 vs. SBHVX (51.57).
| FTHFX | SBHVX | FTHFX / SBHVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.99 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.00 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.280 | 1.545 | 212% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250000 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 412M | 2,597% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.09 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | 10.06 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.75 | 25.74 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.86 | 51.57 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.69 | 39.49 | 384% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers