Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs SBHVX
FTHFX vs SBHVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SBHVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.34
Change+$0.27 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.13B
Segall Bryant & Hamill Sm Cp Val Ins
Price$12.28
Change+$0.06 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets358.75M
FTHFX vs SBHVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SBHVX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and SBHVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.14B vs. SBHVX (359M). SBHVX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: SBHVX (1.16) vs FTHFX (0.82). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SBHVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SBHVX (12 years). SBHVX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. SBHVX (35.00). SBHVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SBHVX (250000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.16 vs. SBHVX (-8.00). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.37 vs. SBHVX (33.53).
| FTHFX | SBHVX | FTHFX / SBHVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.99 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.99 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.779 | -17.931 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250000 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.14B | 359M | 2,545% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.16 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.16 | -8.00 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.87 | -10.48 | -190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.37 | 33.53 | 278% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.84 | 13.04 | 589% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...