Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SBHVX
FTHFX vs SBHVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SBHVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.16
Change+$0.61 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.26B
Segall Bryant & Hamill Sm Cp Val Ins
Price$16.16
Change+$0.27 (+1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets419.14M
FTHFX vs SBHVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SBHVX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and SBHVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. SBHVX (419M). SBHVX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: SBHVX (0.99) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SBHVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SBHVX (12 years). SBHVX (1.00) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. SBHVX (33.00). SBHVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SBHVX (250000) vs FTHFX (1000000). SBHVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.55 vs. FTHFX (8.53). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 103.71 vs. SBHVX (53.35).
| FTHFX | SBHVX | FTHFX / SBHVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.99 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.00 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.502 | 8.529 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250000 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 419M | 2,697% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.99 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.53 | 10.55 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.33 | 36.49 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.71 | 53.35 | 194% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.64 | 56.80 | 314% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers