Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SCUVX
FTHFX vs SCUVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SCUVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.85
Change-$0.19 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.31B
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps A
Price$29.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets189.46M
FTHFX vs SCUVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SCUVX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and SCUVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. SCUVX (189M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than SCUVX: FTHFX (0.70) vs SCUVX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SCUVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SCUVX (19 years). SCUVX (1.40) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). SCUVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). SCUVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SCUVX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.76 vs. SCUVX (-1.95). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 106.16 vs. SCUVX (26.65).
| FTHFX | SCUVX | FTHFX / SCUVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.35 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.40 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.172 | 0.691 | 1,471% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 189M | 5,979% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.76 | -1.95 | -244% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.19 | 17.65 | 318% |
| Returns for 5 years | 106.16 | 26.65 | 398% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.10 | 20.34 | 876% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers