Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SCUVX
FTHFX vs SCUVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SCUVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.48
Change+$0.29 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.71B
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps A
Price$27.29
Change-$0.10 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets193.29M
FTHFX vs SCUVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SCUVX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and SCUVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. SCUVX (193M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than SCUVX: FTHFX (0.74) vs SCUVX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SCUVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SCUVX (19 years). SCUVX (1.40) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). SCUVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). SCUVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SCUVX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.89 vs. SCUVX (-3.77). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 86.93 vs. SCUVX (16.28).
| FTHFX | SCUVX | FTHFX / SCUVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.35 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.40 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.535 | -5.669 | -80% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 193M | 5,544% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.89 | -3.77 | -130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.50 | 3.33 | 1,245% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.93 | 16.28 | 534% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.47 | 8.37 | 1,810% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers