Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SKSEX
FTHFX vs SKSEX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SKSEX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$45.42
Change+$0.26 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.26B
AMG GW&K Small Cap Value N
Price$28.45
Change+$0.08 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.5M
FTHFX vs SKSEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SKSEX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and SKSEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.3B vs. SKSEX (200M). SKSEX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: SKSEX (0.83) vs FTHFX (0.79). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SKSEX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SKSEX (38 years). SKSEX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. SKSEX (24.00). SKSEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SKSEX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.05 vs. SKSEX (-1.70). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 101.00 vs. SKSEX (7.35).
| FTHFX | SKSEX | FTHFX / SKSEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.15 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.19 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.572 | -6.739 | 8% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 200M | 5,150% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.83 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.05 | -1.70 | -120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.94 | 12.11 | 363% |
| Returns for 5 years | 101.00 | 7.35 | 1,374% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.28 | -30.25 | -474% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement