Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SKSEX
FTHFX vs SKSEX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SKSEX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$44.73
Change+$0.57 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.02B
AMG GW&K Small Cap Value N
Price$27.89
Change+$0.47 (+1.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets194.47M
FTHFX vs SKSEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SKSEX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and SKSEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. SKSEX (194M). SKSEX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: SKSEX (0.83) vs FTHFX (0.79). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SKSEX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SKSEX (38 years). SKSEX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. SKSEX (24.00). SKSEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SKSEX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.90 vs. SKSEX (-6.06). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 80.01 vs. SKSEX (-11.11).
| FTHFX | SKSEX | FTHFX / SKSEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.15 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.19 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.774 | -9.862 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10B | 194M | 5,155% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.83 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.90 | -6.06 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.29 | -3.22 | -879% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.01 | -11.11 | -720% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.94 | -32.32 | -424% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement