Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SKSEX
FTHFX vs SKSEX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SKSEX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.82
Change-$0.16 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.19B
AMG GW&K Small Cap Value N
Price$31.21
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets213.67M
FTHFX vs SKSEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SKSEX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and SKSEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. SKSEX (214M). SKSEX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: SKSEX (0.79) vs FTHFX (0.74). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SKSEX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SKSEX (38 years). SKSEX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. SKSEX (24.00). SKSEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SKSEX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.29 vs. SKSEX (-0.20). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 97.07 vs. SKSEX (0.80).
| FTHFX | SKSEX | FTHFX / SKSEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.15 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.19 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.040 | 2.564 | 392% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 214M | 5,234% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.79 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.29 | -0.20 | -2,586% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.25 | 16.32 | 302% |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.07 | 0.80 | 12,203% |
| Returns for 10 years | 179.21 | -18.44 | -972% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement