Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs SKSEX
FTHFX vs SKSEX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SKSEX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.09
Change+$0.52 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.06B
AMG GW&K Small Cap Value N
Price$25.28
Change+$0.23 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets184.31M
FTHFX vs SKSEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SKSEX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and SKSEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.06B vs. SKSEX (184M). SKSEX (0.82) and FTHFX (0.82) have matching dividends . FTHFX was incepted earlier than SKSEX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SKSEX (38 years). SKSEX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. SKSEX (14.00). SKSEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SKSEX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.12 vs. SKSEX (-15.64). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 85.35 vs. SKSEX (1.34).
| FTHFX | SKSEX | FTHFX / SKSEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.15 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.19 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.880 | -17.653 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.06B | 184M | 4,923% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.82 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.12 | -15.64 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.34 | -10.05 | -192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.35 | 1.34 | 6,390% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.85 | -38.28 | -196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers