Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs SKSEX
FTHFX vs SKSEX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SKSEX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.06
Change-$0.14 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.78B
AMG GW&K Small Cap Value N
Price$26.94
Change-$0.05 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets193.52M
FTHFX vs SKSEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SKSEX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and SKSEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.78B vs. SKSEX (194M). SKSEX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: SKSEX (0.87) vs FTHFX (0.82). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SKSEX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SKSEX (38 years). SKSEX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. SKSEX (24.00). SKSEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SKSEX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.58 vs. SKSEX (-10.55). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 98.94 vs. SKSEX (4.49).
| FTHFX | SKSEX | FTHFX / SKSEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.15 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.19 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.888 | -11.275 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.78B | 194M | 5,043% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.87 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.58 | -10.55 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.26 | 4.14 | 851% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.94 | 4.49 | 2,201% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.71 | -33.09 | -392% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...