Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SKSZX
FTHFX vs SKSZX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SKSZX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.48
Change+$0.29 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.65B
AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Z
Price$29.17
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.56M
FTHFX vs SKSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SKSZX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and SKSZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. SKSZX (204M). SKSZX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: SKSZX (1.07) vs FTHFX (0.74). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SKSZX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SKSZX (8 years). SKSZX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. SKSZX (24.00). FTHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SKSZX: FTHFX (1000000) vs SKSZX (5000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. SKSZX (-1.63). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 85.78 vs. SKSZX (-4.13).
| FTHFX | SKSZX | FTHFX / SKSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.90 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.94 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.897 | -3.702 | -105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 5000000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 204M | 5,245% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 1.07 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | -1.63 | -262% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.63 | 9.35 | 435% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.78 | -4.13 | -2,076% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.94 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement