Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs SKSZX
FTHFX vs SKSZX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SKSZX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.06
Change-$0.14 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.78B
AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Z
Price$26.81
Change-$0.05 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets193.52M
FTHFX vs SKSZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SKSZX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and SKSZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.78B vs. SKSZX (194M). SKSZX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: SKSZX (1.17) vs FTHFX (0.82). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SKSZX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SKSZX (8 years). SKSZX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. SKSZX (24.00). FTHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SKSZX: FTHFX (1000000) vs SKSZX (5000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.58 vs. SKSZX (-10.34). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 98.94 vs. SKSZX (5.41).
| FTHFX | SKSZX | FTHFX / SKSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.90 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.94 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.888 | -11.207 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 5000000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.78B | 194M | 5,043% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.17 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.58 | -10.34 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.26 | 4.57 | 772% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.94 | 5.41 | 1,828% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...