Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SKSZX
FTHFX vs SKSZX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SKSZX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.42
Change-$0.02 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.28B
AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Z
Price$31.12
Change+$0.16 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets212.53M
FTHFX vs SKSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SKSZX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and SKSZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. SKSZX (213M). SKSZX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: SKSZX (1.00) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SKSZX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SKSZX (9 years). SKSZX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. SKSZX (24.00). FTHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SKSZX: FTHFX (1000000) vs SKSZX (5000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.83 vs. SKSZX (1.83). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 107.48 vs. SKSZX (3.44).
| FTHFX | SKSZX | FTHFX / SKSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.90 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.94 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.008 | 2.876 | 383% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 5000000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 213M | 5,305% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.00 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.83 | 1.83 | 210% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.12 | 23.36 | 236% |
| Returns for 5 years | 107.48 | 3.44 | 3,127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 180.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers