Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs SKSZX
FTHFX vs SKSZX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SKSZX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.15
Change+$0.49 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.54B
AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Z
Price$31.04
Change+$0.24 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.4M
FTHFX vs SKSZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SKSZX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and SKSZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. SKSZX (234M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than SKSZX: FTHFX (0.95) vs SKSZX (0.86). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SKSZX: FTHFX (13 years) vs SKSZX (8 years). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. SKSZX (14.00). FTHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SKSZX: FTHFX (1000000) vs SKSZX (5000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.26 vs. SKSZX (10.21). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 81.42 vs. SKSZX (-10.79).
| FTHFX | SKSZX | FTHFX / SKSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.730 | 1.818 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 5000000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 234M | 4,487% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.86 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.26 | 10.21 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.22 | 8.66 | 395% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.42 | -10.79 | -754% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.37 | N/A | - |