Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SSCCX
FTHFX vs SSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SSCCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$45.89
Change-$0.96 (-2.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.66B
Saratoga Small Capitalization C
Price$0.36
Change-$0.01 (-2.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.21M
FTHFX vs SSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SSCCX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and SSCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. SSCCX (6.22M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than SSCCX: FTHFX (0.76) vs SSCCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SSCCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SSCCX (27 years). SSCCX (2.91) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). SSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 135.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). SSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SSCCX (250) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.22 vs. SSCCX (-66.67). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 96.46 vs. SSCCX (-84.05).
| FTHFX | SSCCX | FTHFX / SSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.91 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.91 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.148 | 0.000 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 6.22M | 172,164% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.22 | -66.67 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.49 | -74.13 | -64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.46 | -84.05 | -115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 145.47 | -94.50 | -154% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement