Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs SSCCX
FTHFX vs SSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SSCCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$41.58
Change+$0.83 (+2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.26B
Saratoga Small Capitalization C
Price$0.33
Change+$0.01 (+3.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.34M
FTHFX vs SSCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SSCCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and SSCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.26B vs. SSCCX (5.34M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than SSCCX: FTHFX (0.82) vs SSCCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SSCCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SSCCX (26 years). SSCCX (2.91) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). SSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 135.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). SSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SSCCX (250) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.02 vs. SSCCX (-69.23). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 99.44 vs. SSCCX (-82.89).
| FTHFX | SSCCX | FTHFX / SSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.91 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.91 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.282 | -13.514 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.26B | 5.34M | 173,386% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.02 | -69.23 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.86 | -80.00 | -27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.44 | -82.89 | -120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.47 | -95.32 | -83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...