Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SSCCX
FTHFX vs SSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SSCCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$44.73
Change+$0.57 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.02B
Saratoga Small Capitalization C
Price$0.36
Change+$0.01 (+2.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.94M
FTHFX vs SSCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SSCCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and SSCCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. SSCCX (5.94M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than SSCCX: FTHFX (0.79) vs SSCCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SSCCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SSCCX (26 years). SSCCX (2.91) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). SSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 135.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). SSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SSCCX (250) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.90 vs. SSCCX (-66.98). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 80.01 vs. SSCCX (-84.65).
| FTHFX | SSCCX | FTHFX / SSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.91 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.91 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.774 | -5.405 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10B | 5.94M | 168,322% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.90 | -66.98 | 1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.29 | -78.40 | -36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.01 | -84.65 | -95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.94 | -94.81 | -144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement