Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SZCCX
FTHFX vs SZCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SZCCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.37
Change-$0.38 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.99B
FTHFX vs SZCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SZCCX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and SZCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. SZCCX (975M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than SZCCX: FTHFX (0.74) vs SZCCX (0.11). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SZCCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SZCCX (24 years). SZCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. SZCCX (29.00). SZCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SZCCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). SZCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.34 vs. FTHFX (4.59). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 89.14 vs. SZCCX (80.28).
| FTHFX | SZCCX | FTHFX / SZCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.96 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.96 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.495 | 4.889 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 975M | 1,128% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.11 | 704% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.59 | 10.34 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.22 | 17.62 | 211% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.14 | 80.28 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.43 | 68.65 | 225% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement