Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs SZCCX
FTHFX vs SZCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SZCCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$41.58
Change+$0.83 (+2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.26B
FTHFX vs SZCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SZCCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and SZCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.26B vs. SZCCX (787M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than SZCCX: FTHFX (0.82) vs SZCCX (0.11). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SZCCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SZCCX (24 years). SZCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. SZCCX (29.00). SZCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SZCCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). SZCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.05 vs. FTHFX (-8.02). SZCCX return over 5 years is better than : 116.55 vs. FTHFX (99.44).
| FTHFX | SZCCX | FTHFX / SZCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.96 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.96 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.282 | -5.735 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.26B | 787M | 1,177% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.11 | 735% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.02 | 2.05 | -390% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.86 | 6.34 | 345% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.44 | 116.55 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.47 | 53.85 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers