Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SZCCX
FTHFX vs SZCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SZCCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.42
Change-$0.02 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.28B
FTHFX vs SZCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SZCCX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and SZCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. SZCCX (1.05B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than SZCCX: FTHFX (0.69) vs SZCCX (0.10). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SZCCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SZCCX (24 years). SZCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. SZCCX (29.00). SZCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SZCCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). SZCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.47 vs. FTHFX (3.83). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 107.48 vs. SZCCX (88.51).
| FTHFX | SZCCX | FTHFX / SZCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.96 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.96 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.008 | 7.241 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 1.05B | 1,079% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.10 | 689% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.83 | 9.47 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.12 | 26.04 | 212% |
| Returns for 5 years | 107.48 | 88.51 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 180.21 | 82.99 | 217% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement