Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs TRCSX
FTHFX vs TRCSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs TRCSX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.79B
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index I
Price$16.66
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.74M
FTHFX vs TRCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. TRCSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and TRCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. TRCSX (280M). TRCSX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: TRCSX (1.32) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than TRCSX: FTHFX (14 years) vs TRCSX (10 years). FTHFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than TRCSX (0.31). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. TRCSX (24.70). TRCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: TRCSX (500000) vs FTHFX (1000000). TRCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.65 vs. FTHFX (-5.11). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 79.21 vs. TRCSX (32.43).
| FTHFX | TRCSX | FTHFX / TRCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.14 | 450% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.31 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.957 | 6.454 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 500000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 280M | 3,857% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.32 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.11 | 0.65 | -783% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.76 | 30.08 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.21 | 32.43 | 244% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.87 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement