Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs TRCSX
FTHFX vs TRCSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs TRCSX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$41.58
Change+$0.83 (+2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.26B
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index I
Price$13.52
Change+$0.20 (+1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets200.71M
FTHFX vs TRCSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. TRCSX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and TRCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.26B vs. TRCSX (201M). TRCSX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: TRCSX (1.63) vs FTHFX (0.82). FTHFX was incepted earlier than TRCSX: FTHFX (14 years) vs TRCSX (9 years). FTHFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than TRCSX (0.40). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. TRCSX (24.70). TRCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: TRCSX (500000) vs FTHFX (1000000). TRCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.90 vs. FTHFX (-8.97). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 97.43 vs. TRCSX (54.67).
| FTHFX | TRCSX | FTHFX / TRCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.14 | 450% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.40 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.184 | -14.888 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 500000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.26B | 201M | 4,609% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.63 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.97 | -5.90 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.34 | -0.12 | -18,187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.43 | 54.67 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.65 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...