Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs TRCSX
FTHFX vs TRCSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs TRCSX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.50
Change-$0.21 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.63B
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index I
Price$15.83
Change-$0.10 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.77M
FTHFX vs TRCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. TRCSX commentary
Jul 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and TRCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. TRCSX (252M). TRCSX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: TRCSX (1.50) vs FTHFX (0.76). FTHFX was incepted earlier than TRCSX: FTHFX (14 years) vs TRCSX (10 years). FTHFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than TRCSX (0.31). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. TRCSX (24.70). TRCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: TRCSX (500000) vs FTHFX (1000000). TRCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.37 vs. FTHFX (-0.85). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 95.63 vs. TRCSX (54.21).
| FTHFX | TRCSX | FTHFX / TRCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.14 | 450% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.31 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.840 | 1.789 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 500000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 252M | 4,206% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.50 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.85 | 0.37 | -230% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.68 | 33.06 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 95.63 | 54.21 | 176% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers