Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs TRCSX
FTHFX vs TRCSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs TRCSX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.20
Change+$0.63 (+1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.82B
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index I
Price$14.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.52M
FTHFX vs TRCSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. TRCSX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and TRCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.82B vs. TRCSX (205M). TRCSX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: TRCSX (1.63) vs FTHFX (0.82). FTHFX was incepted earlier than TRCSX: FTHFX (14 years) vs TRCSX (9 years). FTHFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than TRCSX (0.40). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. TRCSX (24.70). TRCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: TRCSX (500000) vs FTHFX (1000000). TRCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.61 vs. FTHFX (-6.00). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 134.22 vs. TRCSX (87.02).
| FTHFX | TRCSX | FTHFX / TRCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.14 | 450% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.40 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.275 | -9.457 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 500000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.82B | 205M | 4,788% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.63 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.00 | -4.61 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.74 | -1.34 | -1,767% |
| Returns for 5 years | 134.22 | 87.02 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers