Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs TSMOX
FTHFX vs TSMOX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs TSMOX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.73
Change-$0.69 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.11B
Nuveen Quant Small/Mid Cap Eq Retirement
Price$14.37
Change-$0.24 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.57B
FTHFX vs TSMOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. TSMOX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and TSMOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.1B vs. TSMOX (1.57B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than TSMOX: FTHFX (0.79) vs TSMOX (0.60). FTHFX was incepted earlier than TSMOX: FTHFX (14 years) vs TSMOX (9 years). TSMOX (0.71) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). TSMOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). TSMOX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: TSMOX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). TSMOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.01 vs. FTHFX (-0.23). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 96.61 vs. TSMOX (45.65).
| FTHFX | TSMOX | FTHFX / TSMOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.71 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.71 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.202 | 0.275 | -802% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.1B | 1.57B | 642% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.60 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.23 | 0.01 | -4,021% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.67 | 21.86 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.61 | 45.65 | 212% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement