Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs TSMOX
FTHFX vs TSMOX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs TSMOX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.71
Change-$0.20 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.92B
Nuveen Quant Small/Mid Cap Eq Retirement
Price$14.08
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.46B
FTHFX vs TSMOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. TSMOX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and TSMOX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.92B vs. TSMOX (1.46B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than TSMOX: FTHFX (0.82) vs TSMOX (0.63). FTHFX was incepted earlier than TSMOX: FTHFX (14 years) vs TSMOX (9 years). TSMOX (0.71) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). TSMOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). TSMOX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: TSMOX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.52 vs. TSMOX (-4.66). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 99.25 vs. TSMOX (44.71).
| FTHFX | TSMOX | FTHFX / TSMOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.71 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.71 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.765 | -3.363 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.92B | 1.46B | 681% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.63 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.52 | -4.66 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.14 | 14.15 | 262% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.25 | 44.71 | 222% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers