Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs TSMOX
FTHFX vs TSMOX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs TSMOX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.20
Change+$0.63 (+1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.82B
Nuveen Quant Small/Mid Cap Eq Retirement
Price$13.89
Change+$0.22 (+1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.4B
FTHFX vs TSMOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. TSMOX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and TSMOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.82B vs. TSMOX (1.4B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than TSMOX: FTHFX (0.82) vs TSMOX (0.63). FTHFX was incepted earlier than TSMOX: FTHFX (14 years) vs TSMOX (9 years). TSMOX (0.71) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). TSMOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). TSMOX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: TSMOX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX (-6.00) and TSMOX (-6.30) have marching annual gain over last year. FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 134.22 vs. TSMOX (80.08).
| FTHFX | TSMOX | FTHFX / TSMOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.71 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.71 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.275 | -6.177 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.82B | 1.4B | 703% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.63 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.00 | -6.30 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.74 | -3.72 | -639% |
| Returns for 5 years | 134.22 | 80.08 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...